Jones Day Lawyers in Trump Administration Get Pass to Work With Former Colleagues
Ex-Jones Day lawyers in the Trump White House received a blanket waiver clearing them of ethical conflicts, according to new disclosures. At least 11 other individuals in the White House, plus nearly all employees on the president's executive staff, are now allowed to take up some matters they may have worked on in prior jobs.
May 31, 2017 at 11:46 PM
30 minute read
Jones Day's former lawyers in the Trump White House received a blanket waiver clearing them of professional ethical conflicts, according to disclosures released Wednesday night. At least eleven other individuals in the White House, plus nearly all employees on the president's executive staff, got the White House counsel office's blessing to take up some matters they may have worked on in prior jobs.
The former Jones Day lawyers freed from parts of an anti-revolving door ethics pledge were Donald McGahn II, Gregory Katsas, Ann Donaldson, James Burnham, David Morrell and Blake Delaplane. All now work within the White House counsel's office, which McGahn runs.
![](http://blogs-images.falcon.com/image/EM/NLJ/Donald-McGahn-Vert-201705312327.jpg)
Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
The ethics waiver says the six lawyers can meet and communicate with their former law firm, even though the firm represents President Donald Trump's campaign committee, the Republican National Committee and other Trump political action committees in transactional, litigation and general legal advice situations.
The lawyers should be able to meet with Jones Day “to ensure the interests of the president are protected, and disqualification … would limit the ability of the office of White House counsel to effectively carry out its duties,” the waiver said.
Stefan Passantino, deputy counsel to the president, and James Schultz, a senior associate White House counsel, authored the waiver given to the Jones Day lawyers. Passantino, a former Dentons partner, and Schultz, previously chair of Cozen O'Connor's government law and regulatory practice, were not among the other White House employees given special permission to work with former clients or their firms.
But Andrew Olmem, a former Venable financial services partner-turned-special assistant to the president, was. Olmem received a waiver so he can talk with former clients about Puerto Rico's fiscal issues, insurance capital agreements, the Flood Disaster Protection Act, the Financial Stability Oversight Council's treatment of insurers and on some federal financial regulatory matters.
In private practice, Olmem represented the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America, insurance providers Lloyd's America and Metropolitan Life Co., several investment, capital and asset management organizations and other companies including General Electric and American Express. The specific former clients the White House ethics waiver allows Olmem to speak with are Franklin Advisers, Angelo Gordon & Co., Blue Mountain Capital Management, De Shaw Galvanic Portfolios, Knighthead Capital Management and Marathon Asset Management.
“The administration has an interest in you working on covered matters and serving on that working group due to your experience and expertise in working on these issues in the past,” McGahn wrote to Olmem about a Puerto Rico fiscal policy working group.
Other blanket waivers issued Wednesday went to 10 individuals in the White House including Chief of Staff Reince Priebus to excuse his previous connections to the Republican National Committee; Kellyanne Conway, to allow her to work with her former political, advocacy, trade and non-profit clients; and to all Executive Office of the President and to all White House Office commissioned personnel so they can work with news organizations—likely including Breitbart News, where chief strategist Stephen Bannon previously worked—and Republican political groups where they may have ties.
The White House posted the disclosures on its website.
Previously, the separate U.S. Office of Government Ethics have released ethical disclosures about White House employees, including their financial transparency statements.
An ethics pledge taken by White House employees, and fortified with an executive order from President Donald Trump on Jan. 28, bars them from having official communications with former clients and employees and from tackling issues in the White House for which they lobbied, dating back two years. The executive order nodded to Trump's previously stated intention to “drain the swamp” of Washington's revolving door and influential corporate interests.
Until this week, the White House declined to disclose ethics waivers it had granted to employees, in essence shielding advisers from a public acknowledgement that their past work presented conflicts of interest. The secrecy had been in direct opposition to the OGE's calls for transparency since January. Several top advisers to the president, especially those that had come from the financial services and law firm worlds, had advocated for corporate entities with political interests weeks before they had joined the administration.
Separately, former Jones Day partner Noel Francisco, Trump's pick for U.S. solicitor general, faced scrutiny over his participation in immigration litigation concerning travel restrictions against seven Muslim-majority countries. The liberal advocacy group American Oversight sued the U.S. Department of Justice in May for details about his work on cases in which Jones Day had filed friend-of-the-court briefs.
The Justice Department on May 26, responding to the lawsuit, disclosed a series of internal emails that revealed waivers Francisco received to continue to work with Main Justice lawyers defending Trump's travel-ban executive order.
“As the Acting Solicitor General, he is leading the department's legal strategy in these extremely high profile cases. In addition, these cases are proceeding at a rapid pace, requiring the government to have a point person ready to lead the government's defense,” Cynthia Shaw, director of DOJ's Departmental Ethics Office, wrote in a Feb. 9 email to Scott Schools, associate deputy attorney general. “It benefits the government to have Mr. Francisco provide oversight and continuity in the highly fluid legal environment surrounding the immigration order.”
Mike Scarcella, a senior editor in Washington, contributed to this report.
Copyright The National Law Journal. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The former
![](http://blogs-images.falcon.com/image/EM/NLJ/Donald-McGahn-Vert-201705312327.jpg)
Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
The ethics waiver says the six lawyers can meet and communicate with their former law firm, even though the firm represents President Donald Trump's campaign committee, the Republican National Committee and other Trump political action committees in transactional, litigation and general legal advice situations.
The lawyers should be able to meet with
Stefan Passantino, deputy counsel to the president, and James Schultz, a senior associate White House counsel, authored the waiver given to the
But Andrew Olmem, a former
In private practice, Olmem represented the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America, insurance providers Lloyd's America and
“The administration has an interest in you working on covered matters and serving on that working group due to your experience and expertise in working on these issues in the past,” McGahn wrote to Olmem about a Puerto Rico fiscal policy working group.
Other blanket waivers issued Wednesday went to 10 individuals in the White House including Chief of Staff Reince Priebus to excuse his previous connections to the Republican National Committee; Kellyanne Conway, to allow her to work with her former political, advocacy, trade and non-profit clients; and to all Executive Office of the President and to all White House Office commissioned personnel so they can work with news organizations—likely including Breitbart News, where chief strategist Stephen Bannon previously worked—and Republican political groups where they may have ties.
The White House posted the disclosures on its website.
Previously, the separate U.S. Office of Government Ethics have released ethical disclosures about White House employees, including their financial transparency statements.
An ethics pledge taken by White House employees, and fortified with an executive order from President Donald Trump on Jan. 28, bars them from having official communications with former clients and employees and from tackling issues in the White House for which they lobbied, dating back two years. The executive order nodded to Trump's previously stated intention to “drain the swamp” of Washington's revolving door and influential corporate interests.
Until this week, the White House declined to disclose ethics waivers it had granted to employees, in essence shielding advisers from a public acknowledgement that their past work presented conflicts of interest. The secrecy had been in direct opposition to the OGE's calls for transparency since January. Several top advisers to the president, especially those that had come from the financial services and law firm worlds, had advocated for corporate entities with political interests weeks before they had joined the administration.
Separately, former
The Justice Department on May 26, responding to the lawsuit, disclosed a series of internal emails that revealed waivers Francisco received to continue to work with Main Justice lawyers defending Trump's travel-ban executive order.
“As the Acting Solicitor General, he is leading the department's legal strategy in these extremely high profile cases. In addition, these cases are proceeding at a rapid pace, requiring the government to have a point person ready to lead the government's defense,” Cynthia Shaw, director of DOJ's Departmental Ethics Office, wrote in a Feb. 9 email to Scott Schools, associate deputy attorney general. “It benefits the government to have Mr. Francisco provide oversight and continuity in the highly fluid legal environment surrounding the immigration order.”
Mike Scarcella, a senior editor in Washington, contributed to this report.
Copyright The National Law Journal. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![RFK Jr. Will Keep Affiliations With Morgan & Morgan, Other Law Firms If Confirmed to DHHS RFK Jr. Will Keep Affiliations With Morgan & Morgan, Other Law Firms If Confirmed to DHHS](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/aa/c0/97f0daeb48fbaa463c85f65d14a2/robert-f-kennedy-jr-767x633.jpg)
RFK Jr. Will Keep Affiliations With Morgan & Morgan, Other Law Firms If Confirmed to DHHS
3 minute read![Read the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions Read the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2024/07/Trump-Smith-767x633-1.jpg)
Read the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute read![3rd Circuit Nominee Mangi Sees 'No Pathway to Confirmation,' Derides 'Organized Smear Campaign' 3rd Circuit Nominee Mangi Sees 'No Pathway to Confirmation,' Derides 'Organized Smear Campaign'](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/d3/0a/bf90f0db4fc6bca400dfd15a3d59/adeel-mangi-011-767x633.jpg)
3rd Circuit Nominee Mangi Sees 'No Pathway to Confirmation,' Derides 'Organized Smear Campaign'
4 minute read![Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2024/02/Trump-Smith-767x633.jpg)
Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
Trending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250