Jones Day Lawyers in Trump Administration Get Pass to Work With Former Colleagues
Ex-Jones Day lawyers in the Trump White House received a blanket waiver clearing them of ethical conflicts, according to new disclosures. At least 11 other individuals in the White House, plus nearly all employees on the president's executive staff, are now allowed to take up some matters they may have worked on in prior jobs.
May 31, 2017 at 11:46 PM
30 minute read
Jones Day's former lawyers in the Trump White House received a blanket waiver clearing them of professional ethical conflicts, according to disclosures released Wednesday night. At least eleven other individuals in the White House, plus nearly all employees on the president's executive staff, got the White House counsel office's blessing to take up some matters they may have worked on in prior jobs.
The former Jones Day lawyers freed from parts of an anti-revolving door ethics pledge were Donald McGahn II, Gregory Katsas, Ann Donaldson, James Burnham, David Morrell and Blake Delaplane. All now work within the White House counsel's office, which McGahn runs.
The ethics waiver says the six lawyers can meet and communicate with their former law firm, even though the firm represents President Donald Trump's campaign committee, the Republican National Committee and other Trump political action committees in transactional, litigation and general legal advice situations.
The lawyers should be able to meet with Jones Day “to ensure the interests of the president are protected, and disqualification … would limit the ability of the office of White House counsel to effectively carry out its duties,” the waiver said.
Stefan Passantino, deputy counsel to the president, and James Schultz, a senior associate White House counsel, authored the waiver given to the Jones Day lawyers. Passantino, a former Dentons partner, and Schultz, previously chair of Cozen O'Connor's government law and regulatory practice, were not among the other White House employees given special permission to work with former clients or their firms.
But Andrew Olmem, a former Venable financial services partner-turned-special assistant to the president, was. Olmem received a waiver so he can talk with former clients about Puerto Rico's fiscal issues, insurance capital agreements, the Flood Disaster Protection Act, the Financial Stability Oversight Council's treatment of insurers and on some federal financial regulatory matters.
In private practice, Olmem represented the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America, insurance providers Lloyd's America and Metropolitan Life Co., several investment, capital and asset management organizations and other companies including General Electric and American Express. The specific former clients the White House ethics waiver allows Olmem to speak with are Franklin Advisers, Angelo Gordon & Co., Blue Mountain Capital Management, De Shaw Galvanic Portfolios, Knighthead Capital Management and Marathon Asset Management.
“The administration has an interest in you working on covered matters and serving on that working group due to your experience and expertise in working on these issues in the past,” McGahn wrote to Olmem about a Puerto Rico fiscal policy working group.
Other blanket waivers issued Wednesday went to 10 individuals in the White House including Chief of Staff Reince Priebus to excuse his previous connections to the Republican National Committee; Kellyanne Conway, to allow her to work with her former political, advocacy, trade and non-profit clients; and to all Executive Office of the President and to all White House Office commissioned personnel so they can work with news organizations—likely including Breitbart News, where chief strategist Stephen Bannon previously worked—and Republican political groups where they may have ties.
The White House posted the disclosures on its website.
Previously, the separate U.S. Office of Government Ethics have released ethical disclosures about White House employees, including their financial transparency statements.
An ethics pledge taken by White House employees, and fortified with an executive order from President Donald Trump on Jan. 28, bars them from having official communications with former clients and employees and from tackling issues in the White House for which they lobbied, dating back two years. The executive order nodded to Trump's previously stated intention to “drain the swamp” of Washington's revolving door and influential corporate interests.
Until this week, the White House declined to disclose ethics waivers it had granted to employees, in essence shielding advisers from a public acknowledgement that their past work presented conflicts of interest. The secrecy had been in direct opposition to the OGE's calls for transparency since January. Several top advisers to the president, especially those that had come from the financial services and law firm worlds, had advocated for corporate entities with political interests weeks before they had joined the administration.
Separately, former Jones Day partner Noel Francisco, Trump's pick for U.S. solicitor general, faced scrutiny over his participation in immigration litigation concerning travel restrictions against seven Muslim-majority countries. The liberal advocacy group American Oversight sued the U.S. Department of Justice in May for details about his work on cases in which Jones Day had filed friend-of-the-court briefs.
The Justice Department on May 26, responding to the lawsuit, disclosed a series of internal emails that revealed waivers Francisco received to continue to work with Main Justice lawyers defending Trump's travel-ban executive order.
“As the Acting Solicitor General, he is leading the department's legal strategy in these extremely high profile cases. In addition, these cases are proceeding at a rapid pace, requiring the government to have a point person ready to lead the government's defense,” Cynthia Shaw, director of DOJ's Departmental Ethics Office, wrote in a Feb. 9 email to Scott Schools, associate deputy attorney general. “It benefits the government to have Mr. Francisco provide oversight and continuity in the highly fluid legal environment surrounding the immigration order.”
Mike Scarcella, a senior editor in Washington, contributed to this report.
Copyright The National Law Journal. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Related Articles:
|- Noel Francisco, Trump's SG Nominee, Reveals Divestiture Plan in Ethics Pledge
- Two Venable Partners, Including Outspoken Dodd-Frank Critic, Join Trump Team
- Trump Lawyers' Financial Disclosures Reveal Big Law Salaries, Client Lists
- Trump's White House Counsel Buildup Draws From Large Firms, Government Agencies
- 12 Jones Day Lawyers Take Key Posts in Trump Administration
The former
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Even Playing Field?' Wiley Rein Intervenes in Federal Election Campaign Spending Row
3 minute readBig Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readSupreme Court Will Try to Settle 'Endless Game of Ping-Pong' Over Louisiana Congressional Map
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250