DOJ Advertises for New Compliance Counsel to Succeed Hui Chen
The U.S. Department of Justice's Fraud Section is advertising for a new compliance counsel to replace Hui Chen, who was hired in 2015 as a contract adviser to bring an in-house compliance counsel viewpoint into the department. Chen was the first lawyer to hold the post.
June 07, 2017 at 01:49 PM
4 minute read
The U.S. Department of Justice's Fraud Section is advertising for a new compliance counsel to replace Hui Chen, who was hired nearly two years ago as a contract adviser to bring an in-house compliance counsel viewpoint into the department. Chen was the first lawyer to hold the post.
Her departure might come as no surprise, since she has been tweeting out her unhappiness with the Trump administration since May 10, one day after the president fired then-FBI director James Comey over his investigation into possible interference from Russia into the presidential election.
Chen declined to comment on her impending departure and her tweets. A Justice Department spokesman, Wyn Hornbuckle, said Chen's contract was due to expire in September.
“The compliance consultant's existing contract is set to end in September 2017, and the current postings for a compliance expert seek a successor to continue the existing compliance consultant's excellent work in strengthening the Section's compliance program,” Hornbuckle said in a statement.
Hornbuckle said the consultant post “has greatly assisted the Fraud Section's evaluation of company compliance and remediation efforts, trained attorneys in the Section and in other components of the Department of Justice on compliance issues, worked with attorneys in the selection and training of monitors, and assisted the Section in creating a list of sample compliance questions that may be asked to evaluate compliance programs.”
Chen's departure from the Fraud Section, a component of the Criminal Division, will follow that of her boss, Andrew Weissmann, who is joining the legal team of special counsel Robert Mueller III, the former Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr partner who is leading the Russia investigation. Weissmann, chief of the Fraud Section, previously served as general counsel to the FBI under Mueller's leadership.
The new compliance counsel will be hired for a term of two years, and the contract may be extended for additional terms. The pay is $131,767 to $161,900 a year.
Among other things, the new counsel will assist the Fraud Section in evaluating corporate compliance standards and efforts; work with monitors appointed to fraud section cases; and consult with DOJ litigation attorneys on cases involving corporate compliance matters.
The position, which appears to seek a full-time employee rather than a contract consultant, requires at least four years of legal experience, with at least one year of “specialized” experience, such as “a senior compliance position within a multinational company.”
Chen, who was hired in November 2015, brought considerably more experience than that.
Before becoming DOJ's consultant, she served as global head for anti-bribery and corruption at Standard Chartered Bank. She previously worked as assistant general counsel in Pfizer Inc.'s compliance division, and various in-house positions at Microsoft Corp., including director of legal compliance for the greater China area.
In the early 1990s she also served as a criminal trial attorney for the DOJ, and then as an assistant U.S. attorney in Brooklyn. And she has served as a visitor scholar at Cambridge University and an adjunct professor at the Rutgers University School of Law.
If you're interested in the compliance counsel job, you have until June 27 to apply.
This story was updated with comment from the Justice Department.
Copyright National Law Journal. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAuditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readHealth Care Giants Sue FTC, Allege Lina Khan Using Loaded Process to Vilify Pharmacy Benefit Managers
3 minute readJudge Rejects Meta’s Plea to Send FTC Antitrust Suit to Trash Heap
Trump Likely to Keep Up Antitrust Enforcement, but Dial Back the Antagonism
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250