Baker McKenzie Tax Lawyers Wade Into Trump Litigation
The lawyers represent nonprofit group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and the National Security Archive at George Washington University, which claim Trump and his executive office are violating the Presidential Records Act.
June 22, 2017 at 01:35 PM
12 minute read
A tax duo from Baker McKenzie joined the litigation bonanza against President Donald Trump on Thursday.
Tax partner George Clarke, along with associate Mireille Oldak, filed a lawsuit against the president in a D.C. federal court. Angela Vigil, another partner and executive director of the firm's pro bono practice, is also on the case. The lawyers represent nonprofit group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and the National Security Archive at George Washington University, which claim Trump and his executive office are violating the Presidential Records Act.
The complaint alleges White House officials use email applications that destroy messages once read; that some of Trump's “presidential statements” made on Twitter have been deleted; and that despite his claims of secretly taping some conversations, it's unclear if the president is preserving said tapes. Several media outlets reported Thursday that no such tapes exist.
The PRA, which requires the president to maintain certain records, was enacted following the Watergate scandal.
“Critical checks and balances are built into our system of government, including those implemented through congressional and judicial oversight,” the lawsuit said. “The ability of those checks and balances to work depends on the availability of a record of President Trump's actions.”
The complaint also alleges the president is disregarding his constitutional duty to “take care” that all laws are faithfully executed. The suit includes claims that the White House issues executive orders in order to consolidate decision-making power as opposed to using federal agencies, which are subject to more stringent open records requirements. The groups are seeking declaratory judgment that the president and his office are in violation of the law and an order requiring them to comply.
Few Big Law attorneys have taken on litigation directly challenging Trump and his administration. One of the most prominent examples is Hogan Lovells' Neal Katyal, who represents the state of Hawaii against the president's travel ban executive order.
Clarke confirmed he is working on the CREW case pro bono, but declined to comment on the litigation. Prior pro bono cases include the representation of several prisoners at Guantanamo Bay. Clarke is a former Marine, and typically works on international and federal tax issues.
Also on the case are CREW in-house lawyers Anne Weismann and Conor Shaw.
The suit is the latest from CREW, an organization headed by ethics lawyers Norm Eisen and Richard Painter, of the Barack Obama and George W. Bush administrations, respectively. Another suit brought by CREW in the Southern District of New York alleges that by maintaining ownership of his businesses, Trump is violating the Constitution's foreign emoluments clause, which bars elected officials from taking gifts from foreign governments. CREW is also advising Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh and D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine on a similar emoluments lawsuit against the president.
A tax duo from
Tax partner George Clarke, along with associate Mireille Oldak, filed a lawsuit against the president in a D.C. federal court. Angela Vigil, another partner and executive director of the firm's pro bono practice, is also on the case. The lawyers represent nonprofit group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and the National Security Archive at
The complaint alleges White House officials use email applications that destroy messages once read; that some of Trump's “presidential statements” made on Twitter have been deleted; and that despite his claims of secretly taping some conversations, it's unclear if the president is preserving said tapes. Several media outlets reported Thursday that no such tapes exist.
The PRA, which requires the president to maintain certain records, was enacted following the Watergate scandal.
“Critical checks and balances are built into our system of government, including those implemented through congressional and judicial oversight,” the lawsuit said. “The ability of those checks and balances to work depends on the availability of a record of President Trump's actions.”
The complaint also alleges the president is disregarding his constitutional duty to “take care” that all laws are faithfully executed. The suit includes claims that the White House issues executive orders in order to consolidate decision-making power as opposed to using federal agencies, which are subject to more stringent open records requirements. The groups are seeking declaratory judgment that the president and his office are in violation of the law and an order requiring them to comply.
Few Big Law attorneys have taken on litigation directly challenging Trump and his administration. One of the most prominent examples is
Clarke confirmed he is working on the CREW case pro bono, but declined to comment on the litigation. Prior pro bono cases include the representation of several prisoners at Guantanamo Bay. Clarke is a former Marine, and typically works on international and federal tax issues.
Also on the case are CREW in-house lawyers Anne Weismann and Conor Shaw.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWith Big Law Backing, TikTok Tells DC Circuit Law Forcing Ban or Sale Violates Free Speech
American Bar Association Retracts Israel Statements Following Backlash
Trending Stories
- 1Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
- 2Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
- 3Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 4Friday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250