Justices' Fall Docket Grows With NJ Sports Betting Case, Securities Class Action
The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday added six new cases to the fall term's argument docket, including New Jersey's challenge to a federal ban on sports betting at casinos and racetracks, a terror victim's attempt to attach Iranian assets, and shareholder efforts to bring certain securities claims in state courts.
June 27, 2017 at 09:58 AM
3 minute read
The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday added six new cases to the fall term's argument docket, including New Jersey's challenge to a federal ban on sports betting at casinos and racetracks, a terror victim's attempt to attach Iranian assets, and shareholder efforts to bring certain securities claims in state courts.
The justices now have a total of 28 cases (counting consolidated cases as one) scheduled for the new term, which begins on Oct. 2. They likely will add more cases after a conference in September when they cull through the thousands of petitions filed throughout the summer.
In the New Jersey sports betting challenge, two former U.S. solicitors general face off: Theodore Olson of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher represents Gov. Chris Christie in Christie v. NCAA, and Kirkland & Ellis partner Paul Clement is counsel to the National Collegiate Athletic Association. That case is consolidated with New Jersey Thoroughbred Horsemen's Association v. NCAA. The association's counsel is Ronald Riccio of McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter in Morristown, New Jersey.
New Jersey challenges the constitutionality of the federal Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act, which prohibits states from, among other things, “licensing, or authorizing by law or compact,” gambling on sporting events. The law also prohibits anyone from sponsoring, operating, advertising or promoting sports gambling schemes pursuant to state law.
The justices in Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iran will examine a circuit split over whether, under a 2008 amendment to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, U.S. terror victims have a freestanding, independent right to enforce judgments against state sponsors of terrorism regardless of whether the assets they want to seize would otherwise be shielded under the act. Jeffrey Lamken of Washington's Molo Lamken represents Iran.
In the securities case, Cyan v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, Cyan Inc. challenges a California state court decision that permitted a securities class action over alleged misrepresentations in a 2013 initial public offering to proceed in state court. Cyan's high court counsel is Boris Feldman of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati's Palo Alto, California, office. The employees fund is represented by Andrew Love of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd in San Francisco.
The two other grants were PEM Entities v. Levin, a bankruptcy challenge, and Marinello v. United States, a criminal case involving obstruction of federal tax laws.
The justices on Tuesday also announced new circuit assignments in order to bring Justice Neil Gorsuch into the mix.
Justice Samuel Alito Jr., formerly the circuit justice for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, takes over the Fifth Circuit from Justice Clarence Thomas, who will handle emergency applications and other matters from the Eleventh Circuit. Gorsuch will now assume Eighth Circuit duties. Alito also is the circuit justice for the Third Circuit.
The other circuit assignments are: D.C., Fourth and Federal (Chief Justice John Roberts Jr.); First (Justice Stephen Breyer); Second (Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg); Sixth and Seventh (Justice Elena Kagan); Ninth (Justice Anthony Kennedy) and Tenth (Justice Sonia Sotomayor).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided 5th Circuit Shoots Down Nasdaq Diversity Rules
Nevada Supreme Court to Decide Fate of Groundbreaking Contingency Cap Ballot Measure
5 minute readLawyers, Law Groups Oppose Proposal to Require Court Approval for Amicus Briefs
9th Circuit Judges Weigh if Section 230 Shields Grindr From Defective Design Claims
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250