Hemming and Hawing, US DOJ Coughs Up Sessions' Foreign-Contact Form
The U.S. Justice Department on Thursday released a portion of Attorney General Jeff Sessions' security clearance documents in response to a public-records lawsuit, but at a subsequent court hearing, attorneys were still quibbling over the disclosure.
July 14, 2017 at 12:30 AM
4 minute read
The U.S. Justice Department on Thursday released a portion of Attorney General Jeff Sessions' security clearance documents in response to a public-records lawsuit, but at a subsequent court hearing, attorneys were still quibbling over the disclosure.
American Oversight, a nonprofit watchdog group that has sued numerous federal agencies for Trump-related documents, filed the Sessions-related lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in April.
The complaint sought a portion of Sessions-signed paperwork relating to any foreign contacts he had in the past seven years. The group also requested any FBI records that would address any contact between the then-U.S. senator from Alabama and Russians. The Justice Department released a single page in response Thursday, one day after a court-ordered deadline to do so. The department did not release any notes, because, lawyers said at a court hearing, the agency found no responsive records on Sessions' Russian contacts.
According to court filings, DOJ officials made the decision to disclose the document in “consultation with the attorney general.” The lawsuit shows how entangled top Trump administration lawyers have been, and could be, in litigation in the coming months.
The Justice Department, according to American Oversight, resisted revealing the document, in what American Oversight executive director Austin Evers called a “really troubling 24 hours.”
The DOJ asked American Oversight on Wednesday for a 36-hour extension to produce the documents. In its court filing Thursday, DOJ lawyers said they released the single page in consultation with the attorney general. The government, still asserting its authority to withhold the Sessions record, said it “has consented to a discretionary release” of the document.
“Reading between the lines, what happened yesterday is that what should be a cut-and-dry political FOIA decision wound up on the desk of the attorney general or the people around him and it got very complicated all of a sudden,” Evers told reporters after the hearing.
The Justice Department had confirmed in May that Sessions indeed met with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak last year and did not disclose the meeting on the form. A DOJ spokeswoman said an FBI employee told Sessions and his staff that he didn't need to list meetings with ambassadors that occurred in connection to his work as a senator.
The DOJ did not release the signature page of the form Thursday. In the court hearing, DOJ lawyer Anjali Motgi said the agency did not believe that was a clear part of American Oversight's request. U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss of the District of Columbia disagreed, and asked Motgi to consult with the DOJ about releasing the form. Motgi said she would, but that she could not at that time guarantee its release.
“Let's just be really clear what the signature says,” Evers said. “It's below the line that says, 'If I lie on this form it's perjury.' They didn't want to turn that over.”
The single page the DOJ filed is heavily redacted, but clearly shows Sessions checked “no,” that neither he nor his family members had any contact with the Russian government in the past seven years.
American Oversight's lawyers said they will consult with the DOJ about its search process for any additional, relevant records about Sessions' meetings with foreign nationals. “We're going to really pressure test whether the DOJ did its job,” Evers said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRFK Jr. Will Keep Affiliations With Morgan & Morgan, Other Law Firms If Confirmed to DHHS
3 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute read3rd Circuit Nominee Mangi Sees 'No Pathway to Confirmation,' Derides 'Organized Smear Campaign'
4 minute readJudge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
Trending Stories
- 1Exits Leave American Airlines, SiriusXM, Spotify Searching for New Legal Chiefs
- 2Etsy App Infringes on Storage, Retrieval Patents, New Suit Claims
- 3The Secret Prior Art Problem Rears Its Ugly Head
- 4Four Things to Know About Florida’s New Law to Protect Minors Online
- 5US Supreme Court Considers Further Narrowing of Federal Fraud Statutes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250