How Bass Pro Resolved the EEOC's Long-Running Bias Case
Bass Pro Outdoor World LLC agreed to pay $10.5 million and bolster its efforts to hire a more diverse workforce at its retail stores that sell fishing, camping and hunting equipment, following a complaint brought by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The nationwide settlement, ending a long-running employment discrimination case, comes with more than a hefty price tag. Here's a look at the requirements imposed on the company.
July 27, 2017 at 11:57 AM
14 minute read
Bass Pro Outdoor World LLC agreed to pay $10.5 million and bolster its efforts to hire a more diverse workforce at its retail stores that sell fishing, camping and hunting equipment, following a complaint brought by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
The nationwide settlement, ending a long-running employment discrimination case, comes with more than a hefty price tag.
The resolution imposes certain conditions on the Missouri-based retailer to comply and improve its practices for hiring Hispanic and African-American workers at its stores around the country, according to a consent decree filed in Houston federal district court.
The EEOC filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas against the retailer in 2011, charging that the company discriminated in hiring at its stores, unlawfully retaliated against employees who opposed these practices and failed to adhere to federal record-keeping laws and regulations.
The complaint claimed that since 2005, qualified black and Hispanic workers were denied positions at Bass Pro Stores. In Texas and Louisiana locations, the store managers were accused of making racially derogatory remarks. The investigation found classwide hiring discrimination and evidence of retaliation. The settlement outlines which claimants, denied employment at Bass Pro, could be eligible for compensation.
In a statement Thursday, Bass Pro Shop said the agreement did not substantiate the EEOC's allegations of discrimination against the company's founder, John Morris. The company did not admit to violating any laws. The company said it is “fully committed to the expansion of its ongoing efforts to attract a more diverse workforce.”
A lawyer for Bass Pro, King & Spalding partner Michael Johnston in Atlanta, was not reached for comment.
The agreement is similar to a settlement reached between the EEOC and Cabela's in September 2015. The two companies have a pending merger agreement.
Here are key provisions that Bass Pro Shop was tasked with implementing as part of the settlement.
|Bass Pro must boost its recruitment efforts.
As part of an effort to increase employee diversity, the retailer will be required to actively recruit qualified black and Hispanic applicants. Some of these efforts will include reaching out to colleges, universities and community colleges identified by the EEOC with significant minority populations to post openings, participate in job fairs and post job openings in publications that circulate in Spanish and on websites directed at the Hispanic community.
|The deal requires Bass Pro to ramp up employee training.
Both managers and nonmanagers will be trained in diversity efforts. An annual training will be required for all nonmanagement employees, to inform the workers about Title VII prohibition on discrimination based on race and national original. The managers will attend a separate session to cover these issues. An outside trainer approved by the EEOC, but paid for by Bass Pro Shop, will conduct the trainings.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudges Support Proposed Rule Requiring Court's Approval to File Amicus Briefs
Supreme Court Will Scrutinize Mexico's Lawsuit Against US Gun Industry
6th Circuit Judge Readler Cautions Against Shaming Lawyers Over Election Challenges
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250