Maybe Not an 'Anti-Trump Firm,' but Still Suing the White House Often
Don't call the Washington boutique shop Gupta Wessler an "anti-Trump law firm," said its founder, Deepak Gupta. A number of Trump-related policies fall squarely within the firm's core mission, he said, putting the lawyers there—an expanding group—in court in major fights against the White House.
August 22, 2017 at 10:18 AM
6 minute read
Don't call the Washington boutique shop Gupta Wessler an “anti-Trump law firm,” said its founder, Deepak Gupta. A number of Trump-related policies fall squarely within the firm's core mission, putting the lawyers there—an expanding group—in court in major fights against the White House.
“I think Donald Trump's ascendancy to the presidency is a singularity,” Gupta said in a recent interview. “It is different in kind—not different in degree. It's cataclysmic.”
Civil justice, pro-consumer and regulatory matters are the firm's core work, and “Trump makes all of that challenging,” Gupta said. “He is hostile to everything that's been accomplished.”
Gupta Wessler led the recent briefing for the plaintiffs in Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Trump, one of several cases that contend the Trump administration is running afoul of anti-corruption provisions of the U.S. constitution. The firm is advising the attorneys general of Maryland and D.C. in a parallel case.
Listen to our webcast conversation: Lawyering in the Age of Trump
Other ongoing cases include representing a Trump University alumna who is challenging the approval of a $25 million class action settlement that cut off opt-out rights. The firm is defending a class action provision in the U.S. Labor Department's so-called “fiduciary rule” after the Trump-led Justice Department changed its position. Last year, Gupta Wessler filed an amicus brief on behalf of public interest groups supporting the Obama administration's Clean Power Plan. That case is now on hold in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit as the Trump administration reviews the regulations.
“We're small and we don't want to jump on issues just because they're interesting, high-profile issues involving Donald Trump,” Gupta said. “There are so many great lawyers available to do that litigation. The cases we work on are where they intersect with issues we care about. I don't want to be just the anti-Trump firm.”
This month, the firm brought on a new lawyer—Joshua Matz, of counsel and a former clerk to Justice Anthony Kennedy for the 2014-2015 term. The blog Above the Law once described Matz as “nothing short of a legal genius (even by SCOTUS clerk standards).”
Matz joined Robbins Russell Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber after his clerkship, spending a little more than a year there. He said he shares Gupta's sense of mission in the wake of the Trump election. “It was in large part the election of President Trump and the aftermath that I felt this was a moment when it seemed to be important to be working on cases in defense of democracy,” he said.
Matz began working pro bono on challenges to Trump's travel ban and the emoluments clause litigation. In that work, he said, he developed relationships with lawyers at Gupta Wessler, and found the firm “the right place for me.”
Matz is a founder of the Trump-related Take Care blog, which is devoted to analysis of Trump's adherence to the “take care” duty as outlined in the U.S. constitution. Matz said it was clear early that the Trump administration would test parts of the Constitution and legal system in new ways.
“The scope of new and difficult questions was extraordinary,” he said. “In the course of my work on some of those cases, I began to notice there are a hundred conservative law blogs writing about these issues but surprisingly few, more left-of-center blogs consistently tackling important new legal questions arising in relation to the executive branch.”
The Take Care blog is now the home for left-of-center legal academics and practitioners, such as Harvard Law School's Laurence Tribe, University of Michigan's Samuel Bagenstos and Nicholas Bagley, University of California, Irvine School of Law's Jennifer Chacón, Public Citizen's Adina Rosenbaum, O'Melveny & Myers' Walter Dellinger, and the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund's John-Paul Schnapper-Casteras.
Matz said the blog is a forum for progressive lawyers “to talk about difficult issues which also helps form relationships that can lead to amicus briefs and other interventions.”
Matz is not the only high court clerk at Gupta Wessler. Rachel Bloomekatz clerked for Justice Stephen Breyer and left Jones Day to join the firm. Bloomekatz was part of a wave of former Supreme Court clerks who joined Jones Day—reaping huge bonuses.
Gupta said Matz and Bloomekatz are “public interest lawyers at heart” and the firm did not pay the huge bonuses—now as much as $350,000—firms have paid to recruit former clerks.
|'Never Really Know Until You Do It'
Gupta is a former Public Citizen lawyer who started the firm after a stint at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. At the CFPB, Gupta served as senior litigation counsel and senior counsel for enforcement strategy.
The firm's work and growth have “exceeded my wildest expectations,” Gupta said.
“My thought back then, when leaving the CFPB, was I'd seen this advocacy imbalance between plaintiffs-public interest clients and people like those represented by [Mayer Brown's] Andy Pincus or [Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher's] Eugene Scalia,” Gupta said. “The idea was to create a small team to focus on issues and appeals.”
His main concern at the time, he recalled, was whether creating a boutique could be a viable business model. The firm, he said, was never planned to be foundation-funded.
“There is a whole industry of plaintiffs lawyers making money on contingency and they pay experts to build their cases—so why shouldn't they pay their appellate lawyers?” he said. “You can get involved in a case and get paid upfront and get a share on the backend if successful.”
Gupta said he spoke to the founders of Altshuler Berzon, another private public interest firm, and Thomas Goldstein of Washington's Goldstein & Russell, “an evangelist” for starting an appellate firm.
“This kind of thing, you never really know until you do it,” Gupta said. “Failure was not an option. I worked really, really hard those first years, accepting every speaking invitation to let people know we existed. You have to get out there. You can't sit in the library or office and wait for it to come to you.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLegal Issues to Watch in the US Appeals Courts in 2025
Second Circuit Upholds $5M Judgment Against Trump in E. Jean Carroll Case
4 minute readDivided 5th Circuit Shoots Down Nasdaq Diversity Rules
Nevada Supreme Court to Decide Fate of Groundbreaking Contingency Cap Ballot Measure
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Restoring Trust in the Courts Starts in New York
- 2'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 3Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 4Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 5Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250