Legal Scholars, Backing Whistleblower, Question Interior Dept.'s Senior Reorganization
Thirteen legal scholars, in a letter to the U.S. Office of Special Counsel, say U.S. Department of the Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke's reassignment of 50 senior executives is illegal if the moves are part of an attrition strategy or to punish views inconsistent with the Trump administration's policies.
August 25, 2017 at 04:54 PM
13 minute read
Thirteen legal scholars, in a letter to the U.S. Office of Special Counsel, say U.S. Department of the Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke's reassignment of 50 senior executives is illegal if the moves are part of an attrition strategy or to punish views inconsistent with the Trump administration's policies.
“The reassignment of over one-fifth of all senior executives within an agency is more akin to the spoils system that our country abandoned over a century ago than the type of efficiency-inspired mobility that the [Civil Service Reform Act] contemplates,” the letter states.
Georgetown University Law Center's new Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection submitted the letter in support of a complaint by Joel Clement—formerly director of the Office of Policy Analysis at the Interior—against the Interior department. Clement, a scientist and the department's top climate policy official, played a major role in preparing the department's response to climate change, with a particular concern for problems facing Alaska Native tribes.
On June 15, Clement said he was reassigned to the Office of Natural Resources Revenue, which is responsible for collecting royalties from fossil fuel companies. A month after his reassignment, Clement, who has no training in auditing and no direct reports in his new position, filed a whistleblower complaint with the Office of Special Counsel. In an article in The Washington Post last month, he detailed why he filed the complaint.
“I am a scientist, a policy expert, a civil servant and a worried citizen. Reluctantly, as of today, I am also a whistleblower on an administration that chooses silence over science,” Clement wrote in the Post.
A spokeswoman for the Office of Special Counsel declined to comment on the status of Clement's complaint or whether others had been filed by the reassigned Interior department senior executives.
President Donald Trump has nominated Henry Kerner—an assistant vice president for investigations at the Cause of Action Institute—to lead the agency, which oversees federal employees' whistleblower and other personnel grievances. Adam Miles, who joined the OSC in 2011, is the acting special counsel.
In response to press attention to the reassignments, the Interior Department said in a statement in June: “The president signed an executive order to reorganize the federal government for the future and the secretary has been absolutely out front on that issue.”
The 13 legal scholars, whose areas of expertise involve constitutional, administrative and civil service law, include Yale Law School's Bruce Ackerman, Washington University School of Law's Kathleen Clark, UCLA School of Law's Jon Michaels, University of Chicago Law School's Jennifer Nou, Harvard Law's Ian Samuel and University of California Berkeley School of Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky.
Clement's complaint, the scholars said, “presents important questions about the extent of agency heads' authority to reassign members of the SES (senior executive service).” The SES was created as part of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 in an effort to recruit and develop skilled upper-level employees, the scholars said.
“Critical to the SES's efficacy is, with limited exceptions, independence from politics and, with no exceptions, freedom from retaliation for whistleblowing,” Joshua Geltzer, executive director of the Georgetown institute, wrote in the letter submitted Friday on the legal scholars' behalf.
Eight Democratic members of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee late last month asked the Interior Department's deputy inspector general to investigate Zinke's reassignment of the 50 employees.
The Georgetown institute was launched on Aug. 9 by a team of litigators with experience in trial and appellate advocacy, national security law and federal prosecution.
Hogan Lovells partner Neal Katyal is the faculty director. Geltzer, the executive director, is a former senior director for counterterrorism at the National Security Council. Mary McCord, the institute's senior litigator, is a former acting assistant attorney general and former principal deputy assistant attorney general for national security at the Justice Department.
The institute recently filed an amicus brief in O'Donnell v. Harris County, a federal class action challenging the practice of detaining misdemeanor defendants before trial based on their inability to pay money bail. And the institute is supporting the plaintiffs in City of El Cenizo v. Texas, a challenge to a state law penalizing “sanctuary” cities.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All3rd Circuit Nominee Mangi Sees 'No Pathway to Confirmation,' Derides 'Organized Smear Campaign'
4 minute readJudge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
Ex-Deputy AG Trusts U.S. Legal System To Pull Country Through Times of Duress
7 minute read'Even Playing Field?' Wiley Rein Intervenes in Federal Election Campaign Spending Row
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Restoring Trust in the Courts Starts in New York
- 2'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 3Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 4Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 5Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250