FTC's Equifax Investigation Is Part of 'Unprecedented' Year Ahead
Agency, pointing to investigations, fast-tracked $2.75M technology contract.
October 11, 2017 at 02:43 PM
4 minute read
The Federal Trade Commission, preparing for “an unprecedented year of investigations and litigation,” fast-tracked spending nearly $3 million on technology to support the agency as it digs into the Equifax Inc. data breach and other cases of consumer harm.
Federal records disclosed this month show the FTC recently awarded a one-year contract to Innovative Discovery LLC, an Arlington, Virginia-based provider of electronic discovery technology, to provide a secure litigation support service. Justifying the agency's decision not to open a competitive bidding process, the FTC said it “faces usual and compelling circumstances that require the immediate initiation of this pilot.”
“The FTC is entering into an unprecedented year of investigations and litigation, including its investigation into the Equifax data breach and an usually high number of forensic data acquisitions in fraud cases,” agency officials wrote. The contract, they added, “is essential to enabling the FTC to successfully conduct investigations and litigation to stop consumer harm, thus enabling the agency to accomplish its mission.”
According to a federal database of agency expenditures, the FTC is spending $2.75 million for the service. The contract was awarded Sept. 29.
The contracting document—called a “Justification for Other than Full and Open Competition,” or JOFOC—underscores the gravity of the challenge before the FTC as it wades into one of the largest data breaches in U.S. history. Last month, the FTC took the unusual step of confirming that it is investigating Equifax over a hack that compromised the personal information of 145 million people—nearly half the U.S. population. Numerous lawsuits have piled up against the company.
The agency is entering the Equifax probe somewhat shorthanded. Nearly nine months into the Trump administration, three of the FTC's five seats remain vacant, and no one has been nominated to fill them.
Meanwhile, Thomas Pahl, the interim head of the FTC's consumer protection division has recused himself from the Equifax investigation because of his past representation of the credit bureau while at the law firm Arnall Golden Gregory. A deputy, FTC veteran Daniel Kaufman, is leading the Equifax investigation.
In recent years, the FTC has asserted itself as the top cop on the cybersecurity beat, taking action against companies such as Wyndham Hotels and Resorts and Ashley Madison—the dating site marketed to those looking to have affairs—over lax data protections.
Terrell McSweeney, one of the two sitting commissioners at the agency, recently said in an interview with the Daily Princetonian that Congress should give the agency “more authority to penalize companies if they aren't adequately securing very sensitive information that they have.” She added: “I firmly believe we need stronger data security protections, stronger privacy protections, stronger rights around our own data as consumers in the digital age.”
The FTC may not be alone in investigating the Equifax breach. Days after Equifax learned of the breach but weeks before the public disclosure, three managers sold off a combined $1.8 million in company stock. The sales of those shares have prompted calls for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to launch an insider-trading investigation.
Richard Smith, the former Equifax CEO who retired in the fallout from the breach, endured three days of grilling last week on Capitol Hill. Legal teams from King & Spalding, DLA Piper and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan were in the hearing rooms for Smith and the company.
Related Articles:
- DLA Piper, a Hacking Victim Itself, Helps Guide Equifax on Capitol Hill
- Businesses Begin Filing Class Actions Against Equifax
- Equifax, Before Breach, Lobbied to Limit Class-Action Damages
- FTC's Top Consumer Enforcer Previously Represented Equifax. He Won't Lead the Probe.
- Equifax Executives' Stock Sales Raise 'Fundamental Questions' Tied to Breach
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWill Khan Resign? FTC Chair Isn't Saying Whether She'll Stick Around After Giving Up Gavel
Trump Mulls Big Changes to Banking Regulation, Unsettling the Industry
Justices to Decide if Fuel Industry Can Sue Over California’s EV Rules
Gibson Dunn, Greenberg, ArentFox Schiff Among Latest to Lure Lateral Partners in DC
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250