3 Things to Know About US Rep. Tom Marino, at Center of DEA Controversy
Rep. Thomas Marino, R-Pennsylvania, withdrew his name for consideration as President Trump's drug czar, two days after a bombshell from The Washington Post/60 Minutes report about the congressman's role as chief advocate for a 2016 federal law that weakened the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration's control over opioid distributors. Here are a few things to know about the man at the center of the investigation.
October 18, 2017 at 04:05 PM
4 minute read
U.S. Rep. Thomas Marino, R-Pennsylvania, hadn't even gotten a U.S. Senate confirmation hearing before he withdrew his name for consideration as President Donald Trump's drug czar.
The move on Tuesday came two days after a bombshell from The Washington Post/”60 Minutes” report about the congressman's role as chief advocate for a 2016 federal law that weakened the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration's control over opioid distributors. These middlemen between the pharmaceutical manufacturers and retail pharmacies are suspected of being instrumental in the prescription painkiller abuse epidemic ravaging the country, whistleblowers and others in the joint investigation said.
On Monday, prominent senators said they would introduce legislation to repeal the law Marino championed. In a statement on his withdrawal as the nominee to lead the Office of National Drug Control Policy, Marino said he was doing so to remove the distraction to the mission of the agency, an executive office that works to reduce drug use and its consequences.
“I look forward to remaining in service to the people of Pennsylvania's 10th Congressional District and continuing my long record of championing solutions to better equip law enforcement to combat drugs,” Marino said in the statement.
Here are a few things to know about the man at the center of the investigation.
1. He's a second-career lawyer-turned-politician. Marino worked manufacturing jobs—including as a manufacturing manager at Frito-Lay Inc. in Muncy, Pennsylvania—before going to college at age 30, according to his LinkedIn profile. A Williamsport, Pennsylvania, native, he received his bachelor's degree from Lycoming College in Williamsport and his law degree from Pennsylvania State University's Dickinson Law.
After law school, he entered private practice at McNerney, Page, Vanderlin & Hall, an 11-attorney firm in Williamsport, where he remained for eight years, the last five as partner. He also served for 10 years as the elected district attorney of Lycoming County.
In 2002, President George W. Bush tapped Marino to be the U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, a position he held until 2007. He then worked as in-house counsel for Louis DeNaples, a business magnate and casino owner who had been investigated for possible ties to organized crime. Marino resigned that job in December 2009 to run for Congress. Marino defeated the incumbent Democrat in 2010 during the Tea Party wave and has been re-elected to the seat three times.
2. As a federal prosecutor, he went after pharmacy executives. Early in his tenure as U.S. attorney, Marino's office led the prosecution of Rite Aid Corp. officials for an $18 million accounting fraud that led to the largest reinstatement of corporate earnings to that point—$1.6 billion.The pharmacy chain's former CEO Martin Grass ended up pleading guilty to conspiring to defraud investigators and obstruct federal investigations and was sentenced to eight years in prison and fined $500,000.
“No one—not even the chairman of the board of a Fortune 500 company—is above the law,” Marino reportedly said in a written statement at the time of Grass' sentencing.
3. As a DA, he intervened in a friend's narcotics case. While district attorney of Lycoming County in 1998, Marino unsuccessfully tried to have a friend's conviction for dealing cocaine erased from his record, according to a report by (Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania) The Citizens' Voice published during Marino's first congressional race in 2010. According to court records cited in the newspaper report, Marino hand-delivered an expungement motion to a judge relatively unfamiliar with criminal procedure a month after the presiding judge denied the request to have the drug-dealing conviction of Jay Kilheeney expunged. The second judge approved the expungement but later reversed himself when he learned of the other judge's previous denial of the request. Although the second judge ordered copies of his expungement order returned, Kilheeney kept a copy and relied on it, as well as a personal letter of reference from Marino, to obtain a Ford Motor Co. dealership, according to the news report.
Marino denied any wrongdoing in the case when it was used as political fodder by his opponent in the 2010 campaign.
Contact reporter Kristen Rasmussen at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readWill Khan Resign? FTC Chair Isn't Saying Whether She'll Stick Around After Giving Up Gavel
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250