DC Judge Agrees to Ask Israel for Help in Case of Jewish Historical Texts Held by Russia
A Jewish organization has been fighting for years for the return of sacred texts they claim were stolen by Russians in the early 20th century.
October 24, 2017 at 02:05 PM
4 minute read
A federal judge in D.C. agreed on Tuesday to officially ask Israeli authorities to get involved in a yearslong dispute over Jewish religious texts held by Russia.
The Chabad-Lubavitch movement, a Hasidic movement within Judaism, has been fighting for years to secure the return of historical religious texts seized by the Russians in the early 20th century. In 2013, U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth of the District of Columbia imposed sanctions of $50,000 per day on Russia for refusing to hand over the books, known as the Schneerson Collection.
Lawyers representing Russia abandoned the litigation years ago, and the country shows no interest in paying or returning the collection, though the sanctions have accumulated to $83.5 million.
Attorneys for Chabad told Lamberth in a conference Tuesday that an auction house in Israel obtained one of the books and intends to sell it. Chabad asked Lamberth to issue a formal request, known as a “letter rogatory,” to the appropriate court in Israel to compel the auction house to produce documents and provide testimony on how it acquired the book. Lamberth agreed.
The lawyers suspect Russian officials or agents aided a third party in obtaining the book, or purposely failed to secure it.
Nathan Lewin, a lawyer for Chabad, also indicated Tuesday that the group will file a motion this week for a temporary restraining order to block Kedem Auction House from selling the book. Lewin phoned into Tuesday's conference from Jerusalem. He said he inspected the book and could certify it is from the collection, but that Kedem was uncooperative and planned to sell it unless a court order stopped it from doing so. Lamberth said he would consider the motion once it was filed.
Steven Lieberman, another lawyer for Chabad and partner at Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, also told the judge Tuesday that Chabad plans to ask that Russia's sanctions be increased to $100,000 per day. He said the increase is warranted because Russia is blatantly violating the court's order.
In February, all 100 U.S. senators sent a letter to Russian President Vladimir Putin reaffirming their position that Russia should return the collection to Chabad. In April, then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak said in a reply letter that Chabad “never owned” the texts and has “no property rights over it.” Lieberman said the letters showed that Russia's defiance of Lamberth's order “reached the highest levels.”
Lamberth said that when the motion to increase sanctions is filed, he will ask the U.S. government for its views on the case, as foreign relations “is an area in which the court needs to tread carefully.” Lamberth said that though he and the government “don't always agree,” it would be important to know what the U.S. Department of Justice 's position is.
While the DOJ has supported Chabad's claims to the books, it opposed efforts by Chabad to conduct discovery and seize Russian assets out of concern it could hinder the State Department's diplomatic efforts to recover the texts. The government also opposed the sanctions, fearing they could spark similar sanctions from Russian courts in return.
When the government does weigh in on the case, it will be the first time Lamberth hears from the Trump administration on the issue, which plagued the Obama administration. But with the new administration, there is the added backdrop of the special counsel's investigation into Russian interference in the U.S. election, and the increasingly strained relationship between the United States and the Kremlin.
Justice Department lawyer Nathan Swinton did appear in court Tuesday, but said only that the government did not oppose the motion for a letter of rogatory. He said he would inform the relevant officials at the DOJ and the State Department about the court's proceedings.
“They'll want to tell the Israel desk, I'm sure,” Lamberth quipped.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Absurd Costs'?: Visa Faces Antitrust Class-Action Surge Following DOJ Complaint
3 minute read'Systemic and Pervasive'?: DiCello Levitt Alleges WWE Child Sexual Abuse Scandal
3 minute readThe 2024 NLJ Awards: Professional Excellence—Appellate Hot List
4th Circuit Revives Workplace Retaliation Lawsuit Against Biden's HHS Secretary
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Red Tape, Talent Wars & Pricey Office Space Greet Firms Entering Saudi Arabia
- 2A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Becoming Clerk of the Forum
- 3Pa. Supreme Court Taps New Philadelphia Family Division Administrative Judge
- 45th Circuit Rules Open-Source Code Is Not Property in Tornado Cash Appeal
- 5Mediators for the Southern District of New York Honored at Eighth Annual James Duane Awards
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250