SEC's Whistleblower Chief Says Companies Heed Call Not to Silence Tipsters
Jane Norberg, the head of the SEC's whistleblower office, said the corporate world is getting the hint and not using severance agreements to stifle would-be tipsters. “The good news is that I have seen some improvement in this area,” Norberg said Thursday at a securities conference in Washington. The “message is out there” that severance agreements cannot include terms preventing employees from contacting regulators, she added.
October 26, 2017 at 05:35 PM
4 minute read
When the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission reached a $6 million settlement with Anheuser-Busch InBev last year, the accusations went beyond the bribes allegedly paid to Indian government officials. Securities enforcers accused the beverage giant of using a severance agreement to silence an employee who'd stopped communicating with the agency out of fear he would be forced to pay $250,000 for violating the contract's nondisclosure terms.
The settlement came at the end of a two-month period in which the SEC reached a string of enforcement actions over severance agreements. The agency said then that it hoped to send a message about the consequences of stifling would-be whistleblowers.
A year later, the head of the SEC's whistleblower office said the corporate world is getting the hint. “The good news is that I have seen some improvement in this area,” said Jane Norberg, head of the SEC whistleblower program. The “message is out there” that severance agreements cannot include terms preventing employees from contacting regulators, Norberg added.
Norberg said the SEC has brought nine enforcement actions so far over companies that allegedly took steps to impede whistleblowers. Referring to severance agreements that forced departing employees to waive their rights to a future whistleblower award, Norberg said, “In some instances, the language went right to the heart of the whistleblower program.”
Speaking at the annual Securities Enforcement Forum in Washington, D.C., Norberg said she has seen “great carve-outs in agreements” that make clear that any nondisclosure terms do not prevent communication with a government agency. But she still advised lawyers to review severance agreements for any language that could potentially prevent someone from contacting the SEC, in violation of the agency's rule against preventing employees from tipping off regulators.
Her remarks came as the U.S. Supreme Court prepares to take up a key question concerning the scope of whistleblower protections under the Dodd-Frank Act, the financial reform law that gave birth to the SEC's program for rewarding whistleblowers.
The language of Dodd-Frank states that whistleblowers must report misconduct “to the commission” to qualify for the law's protections against retaliation. The SEC has taken the view that whistleblowers who only report misconduct internally also receive protection under Dodd-Frank.
That interpretation has divided federal appeals courts. Supporters of the SEC have questioned the wisdom of companies that argue for more limited whistleblower protections, which could discourage employees from reporting internally.
“For companies, there really are risks either way this case comes out,” said Covington & Burling partner David Kornblau, who appeared with Norberg at Thursday's securities forum discussion.
Norberg has defended the SEC's more expansive view of anti-retaliation protections, pointing to the law's incentives for whistleblowers to first raise issues internally. Earlier this year, she said it was ironic that “some of the same companies that commented during the rule-making process about requiring internal reporting or incentivizing internal reporting are some of the very same companies who are in court now challenging an employee's right to bring a whistleblower retaliation lawsuit for reporting the information internally.”
“So, in my view, this is a little bit of a thorny issue and a case of be careful of what you wish for.”
Read more:
Wells Fargo's Whistleblower Problem Could Grow Substantially
SEC Says Companies Should Take the Hint and Not Impede Whistleblowers
Veteran DC Whistleblower Lawyer Says She Reps 'Good Guy' in Weinstein Scandal
Ex-SEC Regulators Sean McKessy, Linda Thomsen Spar on Whistleblowing
SEC Issues Whistleblower Award to Government Agency Employee for First Time
Labor Panel Defines Global Scope of Whistleblower Law, Reviving Contractor's Claims
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Something Else Is Coming': DOGE Established, but With Limited Scope
Supreme Court Considers Reviving Lawsuit Over Fatal Traffic Stop Shooting
US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
3 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250