Manafort Lawyer Kevin Downing Calls Criminal Charges 'Ridiculous'
“There is no evidence that Mr. Manafort or the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government," Kevin Downing, formerly of Miller & Chevalier, told reporters after his client, Paul Manafort, pleaded not guilty in Washington court to conspiracy and other charges.
October 30, 2017 at 04:49 PM
4 minute read
Kevin Downing, a lawyer for Paul Manafort, appears outside of Washington's federal trial court after his client pleaded not guilty Monday to charges arising from Robert Mueller's Russia investigation. Credit: C. Ryan Barber /ALM
Kevin Downing, a defense lawyer for Paul Manafort, on Monday criticized as “ridiculous” the charges brought against President Donald Trump's former campaign chairman arising from the special counsel's investigation into Russia's meddling in the 2016 presidential campaign.
Downing, who resigned from the law firm Miller & Chevalier two weeks after taking Manafort's case in August, had earlier appeared with his client in response to an indictment that alleged money laundering, tax evasion and unregistered foreign lobbying. Manafort pleaded not guilty to the charges.
Outside the courthouse in downtown Washington, D.C., Downing, surrounded by cameras, told a throng of reporters that none of the special counsel's charges involved Manafort's actions with the Trump campaign. Prosecutors, led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller III, alleged among other things violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act, or FARA, a statute that requires disclosure to the Justice Department of lobbying and public relations work for foreign governments.
Manafort had turned himself in to authorities earlier Monday after he and a business partner, Rick Gates, were indicted on charges they “funneled millions of dollars in payments” into foreign companies and bank accounts opened by them and accomplices in countries such as Cyprus, St. Vincent and Seychelles.
Downing told reporters:
“There is no evidence that Mr. Manafort or the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government.”
Downing further said in his statement: “Mr. Manafort represented pro-European Union campaigns for the Ukrainians and, in that, he was seeking to further democracy and to help the Ukraine come closer to the United States and the EU. Those activities ended in 2014, over two years before Mr. Manafort served in the Trump campaign. Today, you've seen an indictment brought by an office of special counsel that is using a very novel theory to prosecute Mr. Manafort regarding a FARA filing.”
Downing said the U.S. government had only filed FARA-related charges “six times since 1966 and only resulted in one conviction. The second thing about this indictment that I, myself, find most ridiculous is the claim that maintaining offshore accounts to bring all your funds into the United States as a scheme to conceal from the United States government is ridiculous.”
Downing walked away and declined to take questions from reporters.
The charges against Manafort and Gates are among the first filed by Mueller's prosecution team. George Papadopoulos, formerly the Trump campaign's foreign policy adviser, pleaded guilty in October to lying to the FBI about his contact with foreign nationals, including Russians, during the campaign.
“Manafort and Gates hid the existence of the foreign companies and bank accounts, falsely and repeatedly reporting to their tax preparers and to the United States that they had no foreign bank accounts,” the indictment stated.
During an initial hearing Monday, Greg Andres, an attorney on Mueller's team, cited Manafort and Gates' significant ties abroad and the “weight of the evidence” to argue that the two pose a flight risk. Manafort and Gates were each released on house arrest and with unsecured bonds of $10 million and $5 million, respectively.
Downing did not contest the terms of Manafort's release Monday but said, “I definitely disagree with the strength of the indictment.” He said Manafort's passport was in the possession of the FBI.
Manafort and Gates are scheduled to return to court Thursday for a 2 p.m. hearing before Judge Amy Berman Jackson.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
Trump’s DOE Pick Could Spell Trouble for Title IX Enforcement, Higher Ed Funding
4 minute readWhen Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
Trending Stories
- 1Tips For Creating Holiday Plans That Everyone Can Be Grateful For
- 2Red Tape, Talent Wars & Pricey Office Space Greet Firms Entering Saudi Arabia
- 3A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Becoming Clerk of the Forum
- 4Pa. Supreme Court Taps New Philadelphia Family Division Administrative Judge
- 55th Circuit Rules Open-Source Code Is Not Property in Tornado Cash Appeal
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250