Goodwin Procter
Goodwin partner William Jay says collaboration was key to the firm's appellate success, including a U.S. Supreme Court victory for Varsity Brands.
October 30, 2017 at 07:05 AM
5 minute read
Tell us about your top U.S. Supreme Court or federal circuit court victory over the past year and how you and your team achieved the win. Our top U.S. Supreme Court victory was Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands. We represented Varsity, which was seeking to preserve its registered copyrights in original artwork used on cheerleading uniforms.
We concluded that we should not endorse the competing circuit tests, and predicted that the Supreme Court would be inclined to a textualist opinion because the concept of “separable” copyrighted works is so malleable once it's unmoored from the text.
So where the text diverged from Copyright Office practice, we stuck with the text even though it could mean less deference. The court had a much clearer path than the circuits; there was only one relevant precedent, plus the text.
How did your firm approach appellate success in the past year? Collaboration was key—with subject-matter experts for each case, and often with co-counsel or counsel for other parties on our side. We try to be as “flat” (nonhierarchical) as possible, with good ideas or edits welcome from anyone, no matter how junior.
What practice advice would you give your younger lawyer self?
1. Read as much good writing as you can—nonlegal as well as legal.
2. Set aside some time each day for long-term planning, because otherwise the immediate tasks at hand will swallow all your time.
Responses submitted by William Jay, co-chair of Goodwin's appellate litigation practice.
William Jay ofTell us about your top U.S. Supreme Court or federal circuit court victory over the past year and how you and your team achieved the win. Our top U.S. Supreme Court victory was Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands. We represented Varsity, which was seeking to preserve its registered copyrights in original artwork used on cheerleading uniforms.
We concluded that we should not endorse the competing circuit tests, and predicted that the Supreme Court would be inclined to a textualist opinion because the concept of “separable” copyrighted works is so malleable once it's unmoored from the text.
So where the text diverged from Copyright Office practice, we stuck with the text even though it could mean less deference. The court had a much clearer path than the circuits; there was only one relevant precedent, plus the text.
How did your firm approach appellate success in the past year? Collaboration was key—with subject-matter experts for each case, and often with co-counsel or counsel for other parties on our side. We try to be as “flat” (nonhierarchical) as possible, with good ideas or edits welcome from anyone, no matter how junior.
What practice advice would you give your younger lawyer self?
1. Read as much good writing as you can—nonlegal as well as legal.
2. Set aside some time each day for long-term planning, because otherwise the immediate tasks at hand will swallow all your time.
Responses submitted by William Jay, co-chair of Goodwin's appellate litigation practice.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
3 minute readSelendy Gay Files Lawsuit Challenging Trump's Workforce Reclassification EO
2 minute readDissenter Blasts 4th Circuit Majority Decision Upholding Meta's Section 230 Defense
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250