More Than 200 Civil Rights Groups Oppose DC Circuit Nominee Greg Katsas
The groups say Katsas, a White House lawyer and former Jones Day partner, is unable to be independent from the executive branch.
November 07, 2017 at 04:58 PM
7 minute read
Citing his work for the Trump administration, a coalition of more than 200 civil rights organizations sent a letter to lawmakers Tuesday opposing the nomination of current deputy White House counsel Greg Katsas for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Vanita Gupta, the president of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and former acting head of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, wrote in the letter to senators that Katsas worked to advance conservative policies that restrict the rights of LGBT people, women and voters. The Leadership Conference represents such groups as the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the American Civil Liberties Union and the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.
“[Katsas] has not demonstrated the necessary independence and fair-mindedness needed to serve in a lifetime appointment on the powerful D.C. Circuit,” Gupta wrote.
The Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to vote on Katsas' nomination Thursday, after which his nomination would go to the full Senate for a vote if approved. Katsas was a partner at Jones Day before joining the Trump administration in January. He also worked in various positions in George W. Bush's Justice Department from 2001 to 2009.
During his nomination hearing before the committee last month, Katsas faced heated questions from Democrats about his work for the president on matters that are the subject of ongoing litigation, including the creation of the voter integrity commission, the rescission of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program and the travel ban executive orders. In the letter, Gupta said Katsas' work on these issues disqualifies him from serving on the powerful appeals court in D.C.
Katsas has also been involved in vetting judicial candidates for the Trump administration, another count against him, Gupta wrote.
“President Trump has nominated a long list of extreme nominees who were interviewed and vetted by Mr. Katsas,” the letter said. “Confirming him would be a continuation of this ongoing effort to remake the federal judiciary so that President Trump's extreme policies will have a more receptive audience when challenged in court.”
The White House did not yet return a request for comment on the letter, but Katsas enjoys broad support from the conservative legal community. Following his hearing last month, Carrie Severino, the chief counsel for the conservative Judicial Crisis Network, said Katsas is “simultaneously a brilliant and talented lawyer and an unfailingly kind and humble man” and “will uphold the Constitution and apply the law fairly.”
Citing his work for the Trump administration, a coalition of more than 200 civil rights organizations sent a letter to lawmakers Tuesday opposing the nomination of current deputy White House counsel Greg Katsas for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Vanita Gupta, the president of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and former acting head of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, wrote in the letter to senators that Katsas worked to advance conservative policies that restrict the rights of LGBT people, women and voters. The Leadership Conference represents such groups as the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the American Civil Liberties Union and the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.
“[Katsas] has not demonstrated the necessary independence and fair-mindedness needed to serve in a lifetime appointment on the powerful D.C. Circuit,” Gupta wrote.
The Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to vote on Katsas' nomination Thursday, after which his nomination would go to the full Senate for a vote if approved. Katsas was a partner at
During his nomination hearing before the committee last month, Katsas faced heated questions from Democrats about his work for the president on matters that are the subject of ongoing litigation, including the creation of the voter integrity commission, the rescission of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program and the travel ban executive orders. In the letter, Gupta said Katsas' work on these issues disqualifies him from serving on the powerful appeals court in D.C.
Katsas has also been involved in vetting judicial candidates for the Trump administration, another count against him, Gupta wrote.
“President Trump has nominated a long list of extreme nominees who were interviewed and vetted by Mr. Katsas,” the letter said. “Confirming him would be a continuation of this ongoing effort to remake the federal judiciary so that President Trump's extreme policies will have a more receptive audience when challenged in court.”
The White House did not yet return a request for comment on the letter, but Katsas enjoys broad support from the conservative legal community. Following his hearing last month, Carrie Severino, the chief counsel for the conservative Judicial Crisis Network, said Katsas is “simultaneously a brilliant and talented lawyer and an unfailingly kind and humble man” and “will uphold the Constitution and apply the law fairly.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
8th Circuit Appeal Could Weaken Key Defense in Disability Bias Cases, Employment Lawyers Say
Michael Cohen Loses Bid for Supreme Court Review of Civil Rights Lawsuit
ACLU's Strangio Will Become First Openly Trans Attorney to Argue at Supreme Court
Trending Stories
- 1How Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
- 2Jury Awards $1.25M to Police Officer Who Claimed Sexual Harassment
- 3Lawyer as Whistleblower? Associate Sues Firm
- 4New Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
- 5Ex-Big Law Attorney Disbarred for Defrauding $1 Million of Client Money
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250