Trump Picks Holland & Knight Partner, Brother-in-Law of FBI Director, for Intelligence Post
Holland & Knight partner Jason Klitenic, a former deputy general counsel at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, is the Trump administration's pick to serve as the top lawyer at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Klitenic is a brother-in-law to FBI Director Christopher Wray, who gave him a shout-out at his confirmation hearing this year.
November 14, 2017 at 02:35 PM
4 minute read
Holland & Knight offices in Washington. Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi / ALM
Holland & Knight partner Jason Klitenic, a former deputy general counsel at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, is the Trump administration's pick to serve as the top lawyer at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
Klitenic, who served on the Trump transition team, leads the national security team at Holland & Knight in Washington. He's worked with Homeland Security, and with the U.S. Department of Defense and U.S. Department of State, to address security concerns arising out of travel and trade activities. He joined the firm in 2010 as a partner in the government contracts practice group.
Klitenic could not be reached for comment Tuesday.
He had previously served as a deputy associate attorney general in the early years of President George W. Bush's administration before becoming the first deputy general counsel at the Department of Homeland Security in 2003.
Announcing Klitenic's hiring in 2010, Holland & Knight partner Richard Duvall said: “In this era of heightened security we are proud to have such a highly experienced and talented individual joining our team. Jason's extensive knowledge of federal and state homeland security programs, enforcement efforts and regulatory issues will enhance our ability to advocate on behalf of our clients.”
On the transition team, he was the point person for the Government Printing Office and for the National Archives and Records Administration. Klitenic's background in government contracts work would be central to his role as ODNI's general counsel.
Then-ODNI GC Robert Litt, testifying in 2013. Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi/ ALMThe office of the national intelligence director has a statutory responsibility to set contracting policies for the intelligence community, making it a place contractors turn to when they have disputes with other agencies. The office plays a coordinating role that will put Klitenic in regular contact with his peers at other intelligence agencies, along with lawyers at the Justice Department and Department of State.
“You're not the general counsel for the whole intelligence community, but you do play a coordinating function. If there are differences between agencies, you can mediate those,” said Robert Litt, of counsel at Morrison & Foerster, who served as the director of national intelligence's general counsel from 2009 until President Donald Trump took office in January.
Klitenic's duties will include serving on the national security “lawyers group,” a collection of attorneys from those agencies who provide legal advice on some of the day's most pressing national security issues. “I would anticipate that before the president made any significant national security decision, the national security lawyers group would be asked to offer views on its legality,” Litt said Tuesday.
Klitenic would serve under Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, a former U.S. senator who served as ambassador to Germany in Bush's first term. But he will have a close relationship with another key player in the enforcement community: FBI Director Christopher Wray.
At his confirmation hearing in July, Wray, a former partner at King & Spalding, gave a shout-out to his “brother-in-law and sister-in-law Jason and Kate Klitenic,” who were both in attendance along with his wife, parents and other family members.
“A commitment like this affects the whole family, and I have no words to adequately express my gratitude to all of them,” Wray said then.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
3 minute readUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250