Dechert's Steven Bradbury, Rebuked in Senate, Is Confirmed as Transportation GC
Steven Bradbury, a Dechert litigation partner in Washington and former top U.S. Justice Department lawyer, narrowly won confirmation Tuesday as general counsel to the U.S. Transportation Department after a rebuke for his role in writing memos that justified the use of harsh tactics against detainees in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terror attacks.
November 15, 2017 at 08:48 AM
5 minute read
Steven Bradbury testifies in the Senate in 2008. Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi
Steven Bradbury, a Dechert litigation partner in Washington and former top U.S. Justice Department lawyer, narrowly won confirmation Tuesday as general counsel to the U.S. Transportation Department after a rebuke for his role in writing memos that justified the use of harsh tactics against detainees in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terror attacks.
Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona used a 15-minute floor speech to lash Bradbury, a former leader of the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel during the George W. Bush administration. Bradbury was confirmed 50-47 as the top lawyer at the Transportation Department, where he will oversee nearly 500 attorneys across the agency.
“I must say to my colleagues, in the years that I have been here, in the United States Senate, I never believed that I would be voting against an individual who justified the practice of torture,” McCain said. He added, later: “Put simply, Mr. Bradbury's memos were permission slips for torture.”
At his confirmation hearing, Senate Democrats scrutinized Bradbury over Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) memos that permitted U.S. investigators to use enhanced interrogation tactics such as waterboarding and sleep deprivation. Bradbury, in his remarks then, called OLC the place “where the buck often stops on contentious legal issues” facing executive officials.
“Every opinion I gave for OLC represented my best judgment of what the laws in effect at that time required,” Dechert said, according to reports. “I certainly recognize and respect that some of the questions we addressed during my tenure in the office raised difficult issues about which reasonable people could disagree.”
McCain, speaking late Tuesday, said he would “challenge Mr. Bradbury to go through 48 hours of sleep deprivation before he signs off on another memo.”
McCain said in his speech:
“I know their responsibilities were grave and urgent, and the strain of their duty was considerable. I admire their dedication and love of country. But I argued then and I argue now that it was wrong to use these methods and that it undermined our security interests and that it contradicted the ideals that define us and which we have sacrificed so much to defend. Mr. Bradbury has justified his work on these torture memos as the duty of the lawyer representing his client the commander in chief of the United States. I believe he had a higher duty, as to all who serve this country, to defend our most cherished ideals from wholesale violation in the same of self-defense.”
McCain also voted against the nomination of Dechert's Steven Engel to lead DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel. Engel was confirmed last week 51-47. Bradbury hired Engel for an OLC post during the Bush administration. “He can deliver the bad news. He is not someone who is driven by ideology. I am confident he will focus on the strongest, most reasonable basis” for determining the lawfulness of proposed action, Bradbury told The National Law Journal in January.
At the Transportation Department, Bradbury will work closely with Secretary Elaine Chao. One major issue on their plate: regulatory oversight of the driverless car industry. “DOT's mission is exceptionally important,” Bradbury said at his confirmation hearing. “The liberty and prosperity of the American people depend in no small part on the safe, efficient operation of the Nation's transportation systems and infrastructure.”
Katie Thompson, an Obama-era Transportation Department general counsel, recently left Morrison & Foerster for a new logistics role at Amazon.com.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'New Circumstances': Winston & Strawn Seek Expedited Relief in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute read5th Circuit Rules Open-Source Code Is Not Property in Tornado Cash Appeal
5 minute readDOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250