Citing 'Rule of Law,' Jeff Sessions Brings Changes to DOJ Guidance Policy
The attorney general made the announcement in a speech Friday at the Federalist Society's annual conference in Washington.
November 17, 2017 at 03:23 PM
3 minute read
U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced Friday the Justice Department will revamp its policy for issuing guidance documents.
Speaking at the Federalist Society's annual conference in Washington Friday, Sessions said the Justice Department will no longer issue guidance that “purports to impose new obligations on any party outside the executive branch.” He said DOJ will review and repeal any documents that could violate this policy.
“Too often, rather than going through the long, slow, regulatory process provided in statute, agencies make new rules through guidance documents—by simply sending a letter,” Sessions said. “This cuts off the public from the regulatory process by skipping the required public hearings and comment periods—and it is simply not what these documents are for. Guidance documents should be used to explain existing law—not to change it.”
In a Nov. 16 memo from Sessions to all DOJ component agencies released Friday, the attorney general wrote that guidance documents should clearly state they are not “final agency actions” and have “no binding effect” on people or groups outside the federal government, and that DOJ has complete discretion to change or modify them.
“Guidance documents should not use mandatory language such as 'shall,' 'must,' 'required,' or 'requirement' to direct parties outside the federal government to take or refrain from taking action,” the memo said.
According to the memo, the policy does not apply in documents where the department is communicating enforcement priorities or factors considered in exercising prosecutorial discretion.
Sessions did not give any examples of memos he thinks should be rescinded. However, In February last year, the Trump administration rescinded DOJ guidance issued under President Barack Obama that said federally funded schools should allow transgender children to use the bathroom of their choice.
In a letter rescinding the policy, then-acting assistant attorney general Tom Wheeler of the Civil Rights Division wrote the Obama guidance did not “contain extensive legal analysis or explain how the position is consistent with the express language of Title IX, nor did they undergo any formal public process.”
The Sessions memo is posted below:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All4th Circuit Upholds Virginia Law Restricting Online Court Records Access
3 minute read'Where Were the Lawyers?' Judge Blocks Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order
3 minute readRFK Jr. Will Keep Affiliations With Morgan & Morgan, Other Law Firms If Confirmed to DHHS
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Public-Private Dichotomy in State-Created Insurance Entities
- 2How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'It’s a Job About People, First and Foremost,' Says Alexander Lees of Milbank
- 3Morris Nichols Names New Chief Financial Officer
- 4People in the News—Jan. 24, 2025—Klehr Harrison, Willig Williams
- 5Best Practices for Conducting Workplace Investigations: A Legal and HR Perspective
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250