'Lighten Up' Says Ohio Supreme Court Justice Who Bragged of Sex With 50 Women
Bipartisan reaction was swift after Ohio Supreme Court Justice William O'Neill said he'd been "sexually intimate with approximately 50 very attractive females" and defended Sen. Al Franken, Roy Moore and "heterosexual males" in general.
November 17, 2017 at 06:18 PM
4 minute read
Ohio Supreme Court Justice William O'Neill.
Sitting Ohio Supreme Court Justice William O'Neill boasted Friday on Facebook that he had “been sexually intimate with approximately 50 very attractive females.” In the same post, he lashed out at the “dogs of war” criticizing Sen. Al Franken and said he was “sooooo disappointed by this national feeding frenzy about sexual indiscretions decades ago.”
The original version of O'Neill's post, which he later edited, is below:
In an interview later on Friday with Cleveland.com, O'Neill—who is running as a Democratic candidate for the Ohio governorship—also cited media scrutiny of Alabama Supreme Court Justice Roy Moore, saying Moore was being denied due process over allegations of past sexual misconduct.
The reaction to the Facebook post was swift, bipartisan and decidedly negative.
Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice Maureen O'Connor was among the chorus:
“I condemn in no uncertain terms Justice O'Neill's Facebook post,” O'Connor said in a statement. “No words can convey my shock. This gross disrespect for women shakes the public's confidence in the integrity of the judiciary.”
“We have to be better than this,” tweeted Lt. Gov. Mary Taylor, a Republican candidate for governor.
“At a moment when our country is having a tough but necessary conversation about sexual harassment and assault, the last thing women needed were Justice O'Neill's degrading and downright strange comments,” Ohio Democratic Party chairman David Pepper said in a tweet.
O'Neill joined the state Supreme Court bench in 2013. Before that he worked as a registered nurse, and he was a judge on Ohio's Eleventh District Court of Appeals from 1997 until 2007.
In another Facebook message late Friday afternoon, O'Neill defended his original post and took aim at “sanctimonious judges who are demanding my resignation,” urging them to “lighten up”:
Ohio Supreme Court Justice William O'Neill.
Sitting Ohio Supreme Court Justice William O'Neill boasted Friday on Facebook that he had “been sexually intimate with approximately 50 very attractive females.” In the same post, he lashed out at the “dogs of war” criticizing Sen. Al Franken and said he was “sooooo disappointed by this national feeding frenzy about sexual indiscretions decades ago.”
The original version of O'Neill's post, which he later edited, is below:
In an interview later on Friday with Cleveland.com, O'Neill—who is running as a Democratic candidate for the Ohio governorship—also cited media scrutiny of Alabama Supreme Court Justice Roy Moore, saying Moore was being denied due process over allegations of past sexual misconduct.
The reaction to the Facebook post was swift, bipartisan and decidedly negative.
Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice
“I condemn in no uncertain terms Justice O'Neill's Facebook post,” O'Connor said in a statement. “No words can convey my shock. This gross disrespect for women shakes the public's confidence in the integrity of the judiciary.”
“We have to be better than this,” tweeted Lt. Gov. Mary Taylor, a Republican candidate for governor.
“At a moment when our country is having a tough but necessary conversation about sexual harassment and assault, the last thing women needed were Justice O'Neill's degrading and downright strange comments,” Ohio Democratic Party chairman David Pepper said in a tweet.
O'Neill joined the state Supreme Court bench in 2013. Before that he worked as a registered nurse, and he was a judge on Ohio's Eleventh District Court of Appeals from 1997 until 2007.
In another Facebook message late Friday afternoon, O'Neill defended his original post and took aim at “sanctimonious judges who are demanding my resignation,” urging them to “lighten up”:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Financial Watchdog Alleges Walmart Forced Army of Gig-Worker Drivers to Receive Pay Through High-Fee Accounts
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250