Judge Who Handled Comcast-NBC Merger Assigned To AT&T-Time Warner Lawsuit
U.S. District Senior Judge Richard Leon of the District of Columbia was assigned the case Tuesday.
November 21, 2017 at 12:37 PM
11 minute read
Judge Richard Leon. Photo Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
U.S. District Judge Richard Leon is tasked with overseeing the Justice Department's lawsuit to block the merger of AT&T and Time Warner, but it won't be the first time the judge has handled a mega media merger.
The senior judge at the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia signed off on another massive vertical merger in 2011: that of Comcast and NBC. Since news broke earlier this month that the DOJ may seek to block AT&T, a service provider, and Time Warner, a content producer, from merging, lawyers and experts have pointed to the success of the Comcast deal as evidence that the DOJ may not be successful in challenging the merger. But six years ago, Leon was skeptical of the government's conditions for Comcast.
“The government's ability to 'enforce' the final judgment, and, frankly, this court's ability to oversee it, are, to say the least, limited,” Leon wrote in a memorandum that accompanied his approval of the deal. ” … I am not completely certain that these safeguards, alone, will sufficiently protect the public interest in the years ahead.”
The DOJ filed its lawsuit against AT&T Monday, and the case was randomly assigned first to Judge Christopher Cooper Tuesday morning, and then reassigned to Leon. The lawsuit is the first time the DOJ will bring a real challenge to a vertical merger in at least 40 years, and will be a test of the department's Antitrust Division under the new leadership chosen by President Donald Trump, including Makan Delrahim, the new antitrust chief, and Attorney General Jeff Sessions.
The DOJ alleges in its complaint that the merger between the telecom giant and content producer will stifle competition by forcing rivals to pay more for Time Warner content and would slow the development of other innovative ways to deliver video content.
There were similar concerns about Comcast and NBC at the time. As part of the deal, NBC was required to cede all control of the online streaming service Hulu, along with more than a hundred other rules aimed at making sure the merger did not thwart competition in the media industry. Some of those rules expire next September.
In the Comcast case, Leon's skepticism led him to impose his own rules on top of the DOJ's. Those included requiring the merged companies, known as NBCUniversal, to report to the DOJ on arbitration claims brought over content disputes.
“Since neither the court nor the parties has a crystal ball to forecast how this final judgment, along with its arbitration mechanisms, will actually function, I believe that certain additional steps are necessary to monitor implementation of the final judgment to ensure that it satisfies the public-interest requirement mandated by statute,” Leon wrote.
Leon was nominated by President George W. Bush in 2001, and took the bench in 2002. He worked in private practice before his nomination, both at Baker & Hostetler and Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease.
Leon also served as counsel to Congress in various investigations including to the Iran-Contra Committee in 1987, the October Surprise Task Force from 1992-93 and as special counsel to the House Banking Committee's Whitewater investigation in 1994.
Prior, Leon worked at the DOJ in various positions, including senior trial attorney in the Tax Division's criminal section and as a special assistant U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York. He received his J.D. from Suffolk Law School and his LL.M. from Harvard Law School.
Judge Richard Leon. Photo Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
U.S. District Judge Richard Leon is tasked with overseeing the Justice Department's lawsuit to block the merger of
The senior judge at the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia signed off on another massive vertical merger in 2011: that of
“The government's ability to 'enforce' the final judgment, and, frankly, this court's ability to oversee it, are, to say the least, limited,” Leon wrote in a memorandum that accompanied his approval of the deal. ” … I am not completely certain that these safeguards, alone, will sufficiently protect the public interest in the years ahead.”
The DOJ filed its lawsuit against
The DOJ alleges in its complaint that the merger between the telecom giant and content producer will stifle competition by forcing rivals to pay more for Time Warner content and would slow the development of other innovative ways to deliver video content.
There were similar concerns about
In the
“Since neither the court nor the parties has a crystal ball to forecast how this final judgment, along with its arbitration mechanisms, will actually function, I believe that certain additional steps are necessary to monitor implementation of the final judgment to ensure that it satisfies the public-interest requirement mandated by statute,” Leon wrote.
Leon was nominated by President George W. Bush in 2001, and took the bench in 2002. He worked in private practice before his nomination, both at
Leon also served as counsel to Congress in various investigations including to the Iran-Contra Committee in 1987, the October Surprise Task Force from 1992-93 and as special counsel to the House Banking Committee's Whitewater investigation in 1994.
Prior, Leon worked at the DOJ in various positions, including senior trial attorney in the Tax Division's criminal section and as a special assistant U.S. attorney in the Southern District of
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Absurd Costs'?: Visa Faces Antitrust Class-Action Surge Following DOJ Complaint
3 minute read'Systemic and Pervasive'?: DiCello Levitt Alleges WWE Child Sexual Abuse Scandal
3 minute readThe 2024 NLJ Awards: Professional Excellence—Appellate Hot List
4th Circuit Revives Workplace Retaliation Lawsuit Against Biden's HHS Secretary
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250