Holland & Knight Partner Discloses Salary, Clients in Advance of Nomination Hearing
A Holland & Knight partner in Washington who is the Trump administration nominee for general counsel at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence reported earning $828,483 in salary and bonus, according to newly disclosed financial records that certain executive branch nominees are required to file.
November 28, 2017 at 01:34 PM
4 minute read
A Holland & Knight partner in Washington who is the Trump administration nominee for general counsel at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence reported earning $828,483 in salary and bonus, according to newly disclosed financial records that certain executive branch nominees are required to file.
Jason Klitenic, a Holland & Knight government contracts partner since 2010, said he planned to receive a performance-based discretionary bonus—valued at between $100,000 and $250,00—for legal services he's performed this year, according to a financial disclosure published this week by the U.S. Office of Government Ethics. The salary amount would cover last year and part of 2017.
Financial disclosures offer a peek at the salaries and other benefits of lawyers and corporate officials who are entering public service. Klitenic, who leads Holland & Knight's homeland security practice, wasn't immediately reached for comment Tuesday. His nomination will go before the Senate Intelligence Committee. A hearing date has not been set.
Klitenic was one of several Holland & Knight lawyers who found roles on the Trump transition team. A former deputy general counsel to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Klitenic, the brother-in-law to FBI Director Christopher Wray, was on the Trump team at the Government Printing Office and at the National Archives and Records Administration.
At Holland & Knight, Klitenic has represented clients in front of agencies that focus on transportation security, immigration and emergency management. He provided legal services to clients including Qatar Airways; Axon Enterprise Inc., the manufacturer of the TASER brand device; United Parcel Service Inc.; and the Rochester Institute of Technology. His financial disclosure also noted he represented one company and 27 individuals whose names he was not permitted to divulge publicly.
Klitenic said he planned to divest interests—within 90 days of his confirmation—in dozens of major U.S. companies in the manufacturing, energy, insurance and financial industries, according to his ethics agreement, which was released at the same time as his financial disclosure.
The ethics agreement requires Klitenic to avoid participating “personally and substantially” in any matter that involves Holland & Knight unless he first obtains a waiver. Klitenic also said he would not participate in any matter, for a year, that involves a former client.
Klitenic would replace Robert Litt as general counsel to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, established in 2004 as the chief intelligence adviser to the president. Litt is now of counsel in Morrison & Foerster's Washington office, where he focuses on national security matters and risk and management. Bradley Brooker, who joined ODNI in 2008, is currently serving as acting general counsel.
Klitenic's financial disclosure is posted below:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Financial Watchdog Alleges Walmart Forced Army of Gig-Worker Drivers to Receive Pay Through High-Fee Accounts
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250