Judge Upholds Trump's Designation of Mick Mulvaney as Acting CFPB Head
A federal judge on Tuesday refused to undo the Trump administration's designation of Mick Mulvaney as the interim leader of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, rejecting an argument that the White House unlawfully sidestepped the appointment of another lawyer from within the Obama-era agency.
November 28, 2017 at 08:47 PM
6 minute read
Updated 6:02 p.m.
A federal judge on Tuesday refused to undo the Trump administration's designation of Mick Mulvaney as the interim leader of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, rejecting an argument that the White House unlawfully sidestepped the appointment of another lawyer from within the Obama-era agency.
U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly in Washington, ruling from the bench, declined to grant a restraining order the agency's deputy director, Leandra English, requested Sunday night in a lawsuit in Washington federal district court. Before resigning as CFPB director last week, Richard Cordray promoted English, then his chief of staff, to the deputy role in an attempt to put her in control of the agency as the Trump administration moved to nominate a permanent, Senate-confirmed leader.
English, represented by Deepak Gupta of Washington's Gupta Wessler, argued the appointment of Mulvaney, director of the Office of Management and Budget, ran afoul of the succession plan laid out in the Dodd-Frank financial reform law. The deputy director, according to the Dodd-Frank law, becomes the acting director in the absence or unavailability of a director. Mulvaney's appointment, English argued, also undermined the CFPB's status as an independent agency.
U.S. Justice Department lawyers convinced Kelly that the Federal Vacancies Reform Act should control the outcome of the leadership dispute. That law gives the president wide authority to install Senate-confirmed acting heads at executive agencies. Kelly said the text of the vacancies law applies in English's case.
“On its face, the [Federal] Vacancies Reform Act does appear to apply to this situation,” Kelly said in court Tuesday. He said the text of the law “does not say that VRA would not be available in this situation.”
Gupta had argued the legislative history of the Dodd-Frank Act showed that Congress intended to have the CFPB's deputy director step in as acting director until a new Senate-confirmed director took office. But Kelly dismissed that argument, saying he was “dubious of the value of legislative history” and that the legislative history around the succession language in Dodd-Frank is “ambiguous at best.”
Gupta said after the hearing he would speak with English and explore possible appeal options, including any appeal.
A White House spokesperson said in a statement:
“The administration applauds the court's decision, which provides further support for the president's rightful authority to designate Director Mulvaney as acting director of the CFPB. It's time for the Democrats to stop enabling this brazen political stunt by a rogue employee and allow Acting Director Mulvaney to continue the Bureau's smooth transition into an agency that truly serves to help consumers.”
The dueling claims of control had left a cloud of uncertainty over the CFPB. Mulvaney, on his first day at the job, directed agency officials to “disregard any instructions you receive from Ms. English in her presumed capacity as acting director.”
“If you receive additional communications from her today in any form, related in any way to the function of her actual or presumed official duties (i.e. not personal), please inform the general counsel,” Mulvaney wrote to CFPB staff. Mulvaney on Tuesday started tweeting from a new account @CFPBdirector.
[falcon-embed src="embed_1"]
Mulvaney has imposed a temporary freeze on hiring and new regulations. A longtime critic of the CFPB who once described it as a “sad, sick joke,” Mulvaney described his first day at the bureau as “extraordinarily smooth and professional.” He said he plans to spend three days a week at the CFPB and another three in his role as the White House's budget chief.
English, in her own email to agency employees, thanked CFPB staff members for their service, signing off as “acting director.” In a new statement on Tuesday, she outlined the steps she is taking to ensure a smooth transition.
“Yesterday, I spent time at the CFPB, I reviewed transition materials, and I met with members of Congress to lay out my plans for ensuring that the consumer bureau continues to fight for working families,” English said in her statement. “Today, I plan on spending the day at CFPB headquarters taking calls and meetings with external stakeholders and bureau staff.”
Dueling friend-of-the-court briefs took sides in the dispute over the agency's interim leadership. Democratic U.S. lawmakers supported English as the acting leader. Republican-led states, meanwhile, sided with Trump.
“Any federal official who wields that level of power should be appointed by the President—not by an unaccountable federal bureaucrat,” Scott Keller, the Texas solicitor general, wrote in a brief on Tuesday.
Cordray, meanwhile, hasn't said much about the dispute publicly. Appearing Monday night on The Rachel Maddow Show, Cordray said the “the law is clear here” that English is next in line for acting director.
Read more:
Justice Department, in Court, Argues Mick Mulvaney Is 'Proper' Interim CFPB Leader
CFPB's Deputy Director Sues Trump to Shut Out Pick for Interim Leader
Who's Leading the CFPB? Trump Tees Up Clash Over Acting Director
Goodwin Procter Grabs Anthony Alexis, Formerly CFPB's Enforcement Chief
The CFPB Is Losing a Trial Court Ally in the U.S. Justice Department
Consumer Bureau Just Withdrew Investigative Subpoena. That Doesn't Happen Often.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Something Else Is Coming': DOGE Established, but With Limited Scope
Supreme Court Considers Reviving Lawsuit Over Fatal Traffic Stop Shooting
US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
3 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Who Are the Judges Assigned to Challenges to Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order?
- 2Litigators of the Week: A Directed Verdict Win for Cisco in a West Texas Patent Case
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4Womble Bond Becomes First Firm in UK to Roll Out AI Tool Firmwide
- 5Will a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to a Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250