Defense Lawyer in Mueller Probe Rejects Suggestion of Conflict
A criminal defense lawyer representing a defendant in one of the cases brought by Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team pushed back Friday against the suggestion from prosecutors that his advocacy poses a possible conflict of interest.
December 01, 2017 at 05:41 PM
5 minute read
Rick Gates, left, leaves the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia with his attorney, Shanlon Wu, right. Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi / ALM
A criminal defense lawyer who is representing a defendant in one of the cases brought by Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team pushed back Friday against the suggestion from prosecutors that his advocacy poses a possible conflict of interest.
Prosecutors last month raised concerns about criminal defense lawyer Walter Mack's representation of Rick Gates, who was indicted with former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort on conspiracy and money laundering charges. Mueller's team pointed to Mack's involvement in an unrelated wire fraud case in New York against Steven Brown, a longtime friend and business associate of Gates.
Citing the ties between Brown and Gates, prosecutors on Mueller's team argued it was possible that one could be called as a witness against the other. Mack on Friday dismissed those concerns, using prosecutors' own words against them to argue that “neither defendant is presently expected to be a witness in the other's trial.” He rejected the government's call for a “Curcio” hearing to explore any conflict.
“In this case, the government seeks to intrude upon the attorney-client relationship by requesting a Curcio hearing based solely on the fact that the two defendants have had a business relationship unrelated to the matters at issue in their respective cases,” Mack wrote in a brief that was also signed by Shanlon Wu, another criminal defense lawyer on Gates' team. “The government's own letter characterizes the scenario in which a future conflict might arise as 'unlikely,' and 'remote' and the charged conduct in each case as 'separate and apart.'”
U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson recently questioned prosecutors about their concerns, at one point asking whether Brown is a witness in the special counsel's case against Manafort and Gates. “He's not, judge,” responded Greg Andres, a prosecutor on Mueller's team. Andres also told Jackson that Gates is not a witness against Brown in the New York case.
Manafort and Gates were indicted in late October on money laundering and conspiracy charges, along with allegations they failed to disclose their lobbying work for the Ukrainian government. The two men have pleaded not guilty. A defense lawyer for Manafort, former Miller & Chevalier partner Kevin Downing, has called the accusations “ridiculous.”
Mack said he “invited” Gates and Brown to get independent advice from a lawyer not involved in any of the cases. “My representation of both defendants in their separate cases does not presently require me to take an action to advance a position adverse to the interests of the other—and it is difficult to conceive of such a situation arising in the future,” Mack said in court filings on Friday.
“While defense counsel accedes to whatever course of action the court deems prudent, it bears noting that the government's prolix and speculative Curcio filings have damaged the defendants' reputations and peace of mind, incited intense media interest and inaccurate musings, affected public perceptions of their characters, and cost them significant expense,” Mack wrote.
The charges against Gates and Manafort were among the first filed from Mueller's investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.
On Friday, in the latest set of charges, Michael Flynn, the former national security adviser to President Donald Trump, pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about conversations he had with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak during the transition. In a statement issued after his guilty plea, Flynn said he accepts responsibility for his actions, and that he is cooperating with Mueller's investigation.
Mack's latest court filing in Washington is posted below:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'New Circumstances': Winston & Strawn Seek Expedited Relief in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute read5th Circuit Rules Open-Source Code Is Not Property in Tornado Cash Appeal
5 minute readDOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250