Special Counsel Tells Court Manafort Ghostwrote Op-Ed With Russian Colleague
Lawyers on Robert Mueller's team contend the unpublished op-ed shows Manafort is untrustworthy.
December 04, 2017 at 06:26 PM
5 minute read
Government lawyers told a federal judge Monday that Paul Manafort violated a gag order she issued last month.
In a filing Monday, lawyers for the special counsel's office wrote Manafort has, as late as Nov. 30, been ghostwriting an op-ed with an unnamed Russian colleague “regarding his political work for Ukraine.” The colleague, the lawyers said, is “assessed to have ties to a Russian intelligence service.”
U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson of the District of Columbia issued an order Nov. 8 barring the parties and counsel in the case from making public statements that could affect Manafort's trial.
The op-ed was never published, but government lawyers wrote the violation shows Manafort is untrustworthy. While the government previously agreed to bail conditions Manafort's lawyers, Kevin Downing and Thomas Zehnle proposed last month, that position has changed.
“Because Manafort has now taken actions that reflect an intention to violate or circumvent the court's existing orders, at a time one would expect particularly scrupulous adherence, the government submits that the proposed bail package is insufficient reasonably to assure his appearance as required.”
Manafort pleaded not guilty last month to several charges including money laundering and failure to report foreign lobbying. Jackson has already scolded Downing for making statements to the media outside the courthouse.
The filing said that Jackson should impose additional measures on Manafort than were mentioned in his proposal, including GPS monitoring and a “fully secured bond.” The government noted that the largest of the assets in Manafort's proposed package, his Bridgehampton, New York, property, is already subject to forfeiture in his indictment.
“Because bail is substantially about trust—in particular, whether the court can trust that a defendant will abide by the combination of conditions designed to assure his appearance as required …—and because the newly discovered facts cast doubt on Manafort's willingness to comply with this court's orders, Manafort's proposed bail package does not provide the reasonable assurance required by the Bail Reform Act,” they wrote.
Government lawyers told a federal judge Monday that Paul Manafort violated a gag order she issued last month.
In a filing Monday, lawyers for the special counsel's office wrote Manafort has, as late as Nov. 30, been ghostwriting an op-ed with an unnamed Russian colleague “regarding his political work for Ukraine.” The colleague, the lawyers said, is “assessed to have ties to a Russian intelligence service.”
U.S. District Judge
The op-ed was never published, but government lawyers wrote the violation shows Manafort is untrustworthy. While the government previously agreed to bail conditions Manafort's lawyers, Kevin Downing and Thomas Zehnle proposed last month, that position has changed.
“Because Manafort has now taken actions that reflect an intention to violate or circumvent the court's existing orders, at a time one would expect particularly scrupulous adherence, the government submits that the proposed bail package is insufficient reasonably to assure his appearance as required.”
Manafort pleaded not guilty last month to several charges including money laundering and failure to report foreign lobbying. Jackson has already scolded Downing for making statements to the media outside the courthouse.
The filing said that Jackson should impose additional measures on Manafort than were mentioned in his proposal, including GPS monitoring and a “fully secured bond.” The government noted that the largest of the assets in Manafort's proposed package, his Bridgehampton,
“Because bail is substantially about trust—in particular, whether the court can trust that a defendant will abide by the combination of conditions designed to assure his appearance as required …—and because the newly discovered facts cast doubt on Manafort's willingness to comply with this court's orders, Manafort's proposed bail package does not provide the reasonable assurance required by the Bail Reform Act,” they wrote.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All2nd Circuit Orders Retrial in Sarah Palin's Defamation Case Against New York Times
With Big Law Backing, TikTok Tells DC Circuit Law Forcing Ban or Sale Violates Free Speech
American Bar Association Retracts Israel Statements Following Backlash
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250