Marcia Coyle on Justice Kennedy and the Supreme Court's Wedding Cake Case
Coyle on Justice Kennedy: "He's really at the center now of speech and dignity in this case, with an overlay of religion. And I think, as is so often the case, when the justices are closely divided, he may well be the key to the outcome."
December 06, 2017 at 10:58 AM
4 minute read
Human Rights Campaign held a press conference outside the U.S. Supreme Court in October prior to delivering an amicus brief supporting gay couples in Masterpiece Cakeshop. Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi Marcia Coyle, the senior Washington correspondent at The National Law Journal, appeared Tuesday on PBS NewsHour to offer observations on the U.S. Supreme Court's argument in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission.
Justice Anthony Kennedy, not surprisingly, is expected to play a key role in how the court decides the dispute—where a Colorado business owner named Jack Phillips refused on religious grounds to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple. The case pits a clash between civil rights and First Amendment protections for speech and religion.
More Supreme Court news? Subscribe here for ALM's Supreme Court Brief
“Counselor, tolerance is essential in a free society. And tolerance is most meaningful when it's mutual. It seems to me that the state in its position here has been neither tolerant nor respectful of Mr. Phillips' religious beliefs,” Kennedy said at oral argument.
Coyle, speaking with PBS NewsHour host John Yang, said:
Justice Kennedy, for this case in particular, it hits two things very close to home for him. One, he is probably the strongest defender of First Amendment speech rights on the bench right now. And he's also a very strong defender of the dignity of the individual, which was at the center of the opinions that he has written supporting gay rights, particularly the most recent same-sex marriage decision.
So, at one point during the arguments, he felt that the baker's lawyer and the Trump administration's lawyer made a comment. He asked the Trump administration's lawyer, Could the baker hang a sign out on his window saying 'no wedding cakes for gay couples'?
And the Trump administration's lawyer said, 'No custom-made wedding cakes.' Justice Kennedy said, that's an affront to the dignity of gays and lesbians.
So, that's very much on his mind. But also during the argument, he felt that the Colorado Commission on Civil Rights, which ruled against Jack Phillips here, didn't show much tolerance or respect for the baker's religious beliefs, and that also is very important to him.
He's really at the center now of speech and dignity in this case, with an overlay of religion. And I think, as is so often the case, when the justices are closely divided, he may well be the key to the outcome.
Read the full transcript here, or watch the video clip below.
Read more:
'How Do You Draw a Line?' Key Moments From the SCOTUS Wedding Cake Case
In Wedding Cake Case, ABA Says DOJ's Stance Undermines Anti-Discrimination Laws
U.S. Justice Department, Divided Internally, Backed Colorado Baker Over Gay Couple
Justices Hear Competing Voices in Wedding Cake Discrimination Case
This SCOTUS Brief Is Good Enough to Eat. But Will Justices Bite?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
'The Tobacco Industry of This Decade': Slew of Class Actions Accuse DraftKings of Creating Addicts
5 minute read
4th Circuit Revives Racial Harassment Lawsuit Against North Carolina School District
3 minute read
Khan Defends FTC Tenure, Does Not Address Post-Inauguration Plans
‘Old Home Week’: Justice Breyer Hears Challenge to Cruise Ship Ordinance in 1st Circuit
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
