Facing Lawmakers, DAG Rosenstein Goes to Bat for Mueller
In a House hearing Wednesday, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein defended the integrity of Robert Mueller, the special counsel investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election.
December 13, 2017 at 01:36 PM
8 minute read
Facing Republican lawmakers' allegations of impropriety in the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 elections, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein defended the man leading the investigation in a hearing Wednesday.
Republican congressmen repeatedly questioned the integrity of Robert Mueller, the special counsel, alleging his investigation is tainted because prosecutors and agents on his team are biased against President Donald Trump. Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused from the investigation, effectively placing Rosenstein in charge of Mueller. Asked by Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tennessee, if Rosenstein saw any reason to fire Mueller, he said he's seen no “good cause” to do so.
Cohen asked Rosenstein what he would do if ordered to fire the special counsel, as some Democrats fear Trump may do. Rosenstein said he would only fire Mueller for cause, consistent with the regulations that govern special counsels.
“I would follow the regulation,” Rosenstein said. “If there were good cause, I would act. If there were no good cause, I would not.”
Cohen also asked if Trump ever indicated to Rosenstein that he may want Mueller removed. The deputy attorney general declined to discuss any conversations he may have had with the president, but said no one had communicated to him a desire to remove Mueller.
Asked why Rosenstein appointed Mueller in the first place, the deputy attorney general praised the special counsel.
“I believe that based upon his reputation, his service, his patriotism, and his experience with the department and with the FBI, I believe he was an ideal choice for this task,” Rosenstein said.
Rosenstein also defended Mueller's oversight of potential bias within his investigation.
Media reports Tuesday night showed two FBI agents assigned to Mueller's investigation exchanged several text messages criticizing Trump, including one that called the president an “idiot.” One of the agents was removed from Mueller's team in July after the special counsel found out about the texts, and another had already ended her detail with the team, according to reports.
There have also been questions about bias on Mueller's team because many members have donated to Democratic campaigns. But Rosenstein said he did not see any indication of impropriety.
Rosenstein said the text messages were unearthed as part of an inspector general's investigation into conduct at the FBI, and that he would not discuss the IG's investigation. But he added he did not think there was any impropriety on Mueller's team, and that bias and political affiliation are different.
“I've discussed this with Director Mueller, and he and I collectively have a lot of experience managing offices in the Department of Justice,” Rosenstein said. “We recognize we have employees with political opinions and it's our responsibility to make sure those opinions do not influence their actions. So I believe Director Mueller understands that and that he is running that office appropriately.”
Rosenstein also faced questions about the scope of Mueller's investigation, which he largely refused to answer, referring senators back to his initial order that created the special counsel investigation.
Trump has previously said Mueller would be exceeding his authority if he looked into the president's personal finances. Asked by Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, whether Mueller has ever requested to expand the scope of his investigation, Rosenstein declined to give specifics.
He confirmed that Mueller would need to seek Rosenstein's permission to expand his probe, but said Mueller can choose to include matters in his investigation that may seem ambiguous as to whether they fall under the scope.
“There are a lot of media stories speculating about what the special counsel may or may not be doing,” Rosenstein said. “I know what he's doing. … I can assure you that the special counsel is conducting himself consistently with our understanding about the scope of his investigation.”
Facing Republican lawmakers' allegations of impropriety in the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 elections, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein defended the man leading the investigation in a hearing Wednesday.
Republican congressmen repeatedly questioned the integrity of Robert Mueller, the special counsel, alleging his investigation is tainted because prosecutors and agents on his team are biased against President Donald Trump. Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused from the investigation, effectively placing Rosenstein in charge of Mueller. Asked by Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tennessee, if Rosenstein saw any reason to fire Mueller, he said he's seen no “good cause” to do so.
Cohen asked Rosenstein what he would do if ordered to fire the special counsel, as some Democrats fear Trump may do. Rosenstein said he would only fire Mueller for cause, consistent with the regulations that govern special counsels.
“I would follow the regulation,” Rosenstein said. “If there were good cause, I would act. If there were no good cause, I would not.”
Cohen also asked if Trump ever indicated to Rosenstein that he may want Mueller removed. The deputy attorney general declined to discuss any conversations he may have had with the president, but said no one had communicated to him a desire to remove Mueller.
Asked why Rosenstein appointed Mueller in the first place, the deputy attorney general praised the special counsel.
“I believe that based upon his reputation, his service, his patriotism, and his experience with the department and with the FBI, I believe he was an ideal choice for this task,” Rosenstein said.
Rosenstein also defended Mueller's oversight of potential bias within his investigation.
Media reports Tuesday night showed two FBI agents assigned to Mueller's investigation exchanged several text messages criticizing Trump, including one that called the president an “idiot.” One of the agents was removed from Mueller's team in July after the special counsel found out about the texts, and another had already ended her detail with the team, according to reports.
There have also been questions about bias on Mueller's team because many members have donated to Democratic campaigns. But Rosenstein said he did not see any indication of impropriety.
Rosenstein said the text messages were unearthed as part of an inspector general's investigation into conduct at the FBI, and that he would not discuss the IG's investigation. But he added he did not think there was any impropriety on Mueller's team, and that bias and political affiliation are different.
“I've discussed this with Director Mueller, and he and I collectively have a lot of experience managing offices in the Department of Justice,” Rosenstein said. “We recognize we have employees with political opinions and it's our responsibility to make sure those opinions do not influence their actions. So I believe Director Mueller understands that and that he is running that office appropriately.”
Rosenstein also faced questions about the scope of Mueller's investigation, which he largely refused to answer, referring senators back to his initial order that created the special counsel investigation.
Trump has previously said Mueller would be exceeding his authority if he looked into the president's personal finances. Asked by Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, whether Mueller has ever requested to expand the scope of his investigation, Rosenstein declined to give specifics.
He confirmed that Mueller would need to seek Rosenstein's permission to expand his probe, but said Mueller can choose to include matters in his investigation that may seem ambiguous as to whether they fall under the scope.
“There are a lot of media stories speculating about what the special counsel may or may not be doing,” Rosenstein said. “I know what he's doing. … I can assure you that the special counsel is conducting himself consistently with our understanding about the scope of his investigation.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDOJ, 10 State AGs File Amended Antitrust Complaint Against RealPage and Big Landlords
4 minute read'Erroneous Assumption'?: Apple Challenges DOJ Antitrust Remedy in Google Search Monopoly Case
3 minute read'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Persuasive: Facebook Successfully Questions MDL Guardrails
- 2On Inauguration Eve, U.S. Attorney for Texas Exits Job
- 3Signaling Growth Goals, Some Law Firms Promote Record Partner Classes
- 4Seton Hall Escapes COVID-19 Wrongful Death Suit After Student Found Dead in Dorm
- 5Western NY Justice Agrees to Public Admonishment Over 'Obvious' Conflict of Interest
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250