The Late Justice Joseph Story Trumps Louis Brandeis in CFPB Honors Program
The bureau's press statement offers some hints about why Joseph Story, a justice from 1811 to 1845, is being honored, but not about why Louis Brandeis, formerly a pro-consumer litigator, was sidelined.
December 20, 2017 at 01:18 PM
4 minute read
As a possible sign of the new leadership at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an honors program named after Louis Brandeis—known as “the people's attorney”—has been renamed after a different famous Supreme Court justice: Joseph Story, a strong property rights advocate.
“Today, we're announcing that this fellowship, formerly known as the Louis D. Brandeis Honors Attorney Program, will be renamed the Joseph Story Honors Attorney Program,” a press release from the bureau stated.
The program is a two-year fellowship that gives law students and new lawyers “opportunities for training and education not only to gain a deeper understanding of the bureau's mission and work, but also to enhance analytical thinking, writing, communication and other legal skills,” the agency said.
The bureau's communications office did not respond to questions about why the change was made.
Richard Cordray, the first director of the Obama-era agency, resigned on Nov. 24, triggering a standoff over leadership. President Donald Trump named budget director Mick Mulvaney as interim director, but the agency's deputy director Leandra English is challenging the appointment in court.
“Justice Brandeis was a natural namesake for the CFPB's honors program,” said Deepak Gupta of Gupta Wessler, a consumer lawyer who is also representing English. “He was a prophetic voice on the dangers of giving big financial interests too much power over the lives of Americans and he fought for economic justice.”
Gupta added, “Justice Story, on the other hand, makes no sense in this context. His role as a jurist long predates modern consumer-protection law, the rise of large corporate financial interests, and all of the concerns that make the CFPB necessary. I suspect that the real reason for renaming the program was to signal, in a totally symbolic way, the abandonment of the bureau's statutory mission.”
The bureau's press release offers some hints about why Story, a justice from 1811 to 1845, is being honored, but not about why Brandeis was sidelined.
Justice Joseph Story. Credit: Wiki Commons“Joseph Story was one of the most influential legal scholars of the 19th century,” the release stated. “A successful author, he wrote the famous 'Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States,' a work that has cemented his reputation as a patriot dedicated to judicial restraint and the faithful application of the U.S. Constitution as written.”
Story was also known for favoring a strong national government. “Story, like other nationalists of the early Republic, saw deep connections between a strong federal government and the growth of commerce and industry,” according to the Biographical Encyclopedia of the Supreme Court. “For Story, the nurturance of commerce and the protection of property were two sides of the same coin.”
Brandeis was a well-known pro-consumer litigator before joining the high court in 1916, filing suits against trusts and investigating the insurance industry. Business leaders fought against his nomination to the Supreme Court, claiming he was a radical. The Senate confirmed him by a 47-22 vote, and he served until retiring in 1939.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
Auditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readTexas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250