Chief Justice Roberts' Year-End Report: Judiciary 'Not Immune' from Sexual Harassment
“We have a new challenge in the coming year,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in his annual year-end report. “Events in recent months have illuminated the depth of the problem of sexual harassment in the workplace, and events in the past few weeks have made clear that the judicial branch is not immune.”
December 31, 2017 at 06:00 PM
5 minute read
Without mentioning Judge Alex Kozinski by name, Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. on Sunday decried recent reports about sexual harassment in the workplace and said the problem warrants “serious attention from all quarters of the judicial branch.”
Roberts discussed the issue in his annual year-end report, just weeks after Kozinski, former chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit abruptly retired amidst news reports quoting female law clerks and others who stated that he engaged them in unwelcomed and sexually charged conversations and physical interactions.
“We have a new challenge in the coming year,” Roberts wrote. “Events in recent months have illuminated the depth of the problem of sexual harassment in the workplace, and events in the past few weeks have made clear that the judicial branch is not immune.”
Roberts spelled out his previously announced plan to assemble a “working group” to examine whether changes are needed in the federal judiciary's codes of conduct and guidance to employees “on issues of confidentiality and reporting of instances of misconduct,” as well as “our rules for investigating and processing misconduct complaints.”
The widely used law clerk handbook has already been amended to make it clear that judicial employees can make complaints about sexual harassment without fear of violating the judiciary's code of confidentiality.
In an online essay one of Kozinski's victims, former law clerk Heidi Bond, pointed to the confidentiality rules imposed on clerks as a key factor that made it difficult for her to file a complaint against the judge.
Roberts referred to that concern even as he expressed “great confidence in the men and women who comprise our judiciary.” Roberts wrote, “I am sure that the overwhelming number have no tolerance for harassment and share the view that victims must have clear and immediate recourse to effective remedies.”
Improving and clarifying procedures for complaints was one focus of a December 20 letter to Roberts and other judiciary officials, signed by more than 700 former and current law clerks and law professors. Jaime Santos, one of the organizers of the letter campaign, said Sunday she was pleased that Roberts addressed the issue.
“A robust review and effective changes can have a huge impact on the lives and careers of future law clerks and other employees, and on the legal profession as a whole,” said Santos, an associate at Goodwin Procter. She urged Roberts and other leaders to “formally include past and current law clerks in that working group. If there is anything that the last six months of reporting on sexual harassment have taught us, it is that the individuals most affected by sexual harassment need to be part of the conversation about how to prevent and address it.”
The chief justice's comments about sexual harassment came on pages 11 and 12 of his 16-page report, suggesting that it may have been a late addition. The first 10 pages described and praised the response of judicial branch employees to hurricanes and wildfires that occurred in 2017.
“Judges and court employees responded to daunting challenges with extraordinary neighborliness, generosity, and dedication,” Roberts said. One example came before Hurricane Maria reached Puerto Rico in September. The Justice Department's Bureau of Prisons relocated 1,200 detailed individuals to mainland facilities in Mississippi, Florida, Alabama and Georgia, which also meant that judges, translators, federal defenders and other judicial personnel in those states would be needed to handle emergency proceedings and the like.
“I happened to be in Jackson meeting with Mississippi federal judges when word arrived that a large number of the detainees would be sent to that state,” Roberts wrote. “Many of the judges in the room raised their hands on the spot to volunteer to take on the extra work.” He also said court employees from around the country contributed funds and care packages to their colleagues in affected areas.
By federal law (28 U.S.C. 452), Roberts noted, U.S. courts are “deemed always open” for official business—an easy rule most of the time. “When disaster strikes,” he said, “it can be honored only through the tireless efforts of judges, court employees, Administrative Office staff, and the many friends of the judiciary.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Files Appeal to DC Circuit Aiming to Intervene in Google Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readDC Circuit Revives Firefighters' Religious Freedom Litigation in Facial Hair Policy Row
3 minute readDC Judge Chutkan Allows Jenner's $8M Unpaid Legal Fees Lawsuit to Proceed Against Sierra Leone
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 2Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
- 3Jackson Lewis Leaders Discuss Firm's Innovation Efforts, From Prompt-a-Thons to Gen AI Pilots
- 4Trump's DOJ Files Lawsuit Seeking to Block $14B Tech Merger
- 5'No Retributive Actions,' Kash Patel Pledges if Confirmed to FBI
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250