Citing Trump Ties, Fusion GPS Asks New U.S. Judge to Mull Recusal in Subpoena Fight
Lawyers for the firm behind the so-called Russia Dossier want Judge Trevor McFadden to consider recusing from their subpoena battle in a defamation case.
January 08, 2018 at 02:41 PM
4 minute read
A federal judge in Washington, D.C., should consider recusing from Fusion GPS' subpoena fight against a Russian businessman, lawyers for the research firm told the judge last week.
Zuckerman Spaeder's William Taylor, Steven Salky and Rachel Cotton, who represent the research firm behind the so-called Russia Dossier, wrote in a letter to U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden last week that he should consider whether to recuse from a case in which Fusion GPS is attempting to quash a subpoena. The letter was made public in a court order Monday.
The lawyers wrote that McFadden's impartiality could be questioned because of his work for President Donald Trump's transition team, his time as second in command at DOJ's Criminal Division and his representation of clients in private practice at Baker & McKenzie.
On Monday, McFadden issued an order welcoming briefing on whether he should recuse. The judge began work at the court in Washington, D.C., in November 2017, after he was nominated by Trump in June of last year and confirmed by the Senate on Oct. 30, 2017.
In the case, Fusion GPS seeks to quash a subpoena issued to the firm in connection with a lawsuit in federal court in Florida, where Russian businessman Aleksej Gubarev sued BuzzFeed for defamation after the news website published the dossier, which included claims about the Gubarev.
In the Jan. 3 letter, the Fusion GPS lawyers wrote that McFadden's work as a volunteer vetter on Trump's transition team last year raises questions. They cited Trump's tweets and statements about Fusion GPS during the time McFadden worked on the team, including a Jan. 11 tweet in which the president referred to the dossier as “a complete and total fabrication, utter nonsense.”
“Indeed, the President's adversity to Fusion GPS has been repeatedly expressed by his spokesperson and has become an element of his political agenda,” the letter said.
The lawyers added that McFadden should also consider any contributions, “financial or otherwise,” that he may have given to the Trump campaign. FEC data shows McFadden donated $1,000 to the Trump campaign in the 2016 election cycle.
The letter also cites McFadden's recent work at DOJ, where he was principal deputy assistant attorney general for the Criminal Division and oversaw the fraud section from January 2017 until his nomination. During that time, Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, sent a request to DOJ to investigate Fusion GPS for potential violations of the Foreign Agent Registration Act. The letter noted there was no reason to believe McFadden was involved in DOJ's reply to the senator but that other senior DOJ officials did testify before Congress on the matter.
Additionally, the letter raises concerns that McFadden, while in private practice as a partner at Baker & McKenzie, represented the company VimpelCom, now known as Veon, in an FCPA investigation. That company is controlled by Russian businessman Mikhail Fridman, who is also suing Fusion GPS for defamation in a separate case in the district court in D.C. It would be in Fridman's interest, the lawyers wrote, for the subpoena in the Gubarev case to be enforced.
In his order Monday, McFadden gave Fusion GPS until Jan. 15 to file a motion for recusal. Under federal law, judges should recuse in any matter in which “impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhen Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
Justices Seek Solicitor General's Views on Music Industry's Copyright Case Against ISP
SEC Obtained Record $8.2 Billion in Financial Remedies for Fiscal Year 2024, Commission Says
SEC Targets Rising Crypto Financier in $115 Million Securities Fraud
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250