For-Profit Prison Giant Pays $550K to Settle Sex Harassment Claims
A GEO Group spokesperson said the company mandates “zero tolerance towards all forms of sexual harassment in all its facilities.”
January 08, 2018 at 02:51 PM
3 minute read
The GEO Group Inc., the nation's second-largest for-profit prison services provider, is paying $550,000 to settle federal claims that alleged widespread sexual harassment against female employees over a six-year period that ranged from explicit comments to assault.
The U.S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Arizona Civil Rights Division of the Attorney General's Office filed suit in 2010 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona against GEO Group's facility in Arizona. The complaint, which alleged sexual harassment and retaliation claims between 2006 and 2012, said a male manager grabbed and pinched the breasts and crotch of a female correctional officer, and a male employee allegedly forced a woman onto a desk, shoving her legs apart and kissing her.
Other claims against the company included male officers asking female officers for sex, calling women explicit names and managers making sexually explicit comments to female officers.
The lawsuit also claimed GEO Group, based in Boca Raton, Florida, retaliated when women complained about the harassment by forcing them to quit, terminating them or placing them in unsafe conditions in the prison.
Littler Mendelson attorneys represented GEO Group in the lawsuit. GEO Group spokesman Pablo Paez said in a statement the company mandates “zero tolerance towards all forms of sexual harassment in all its facilities.”
He added: “We believe that the range of individual settlements speaks to the nature of the individual claims. The claims included in the lawsuit took place between 2006 and 2012, six to 12 years ago, and no such claims have arisen since. As a result of the settlement, the GEO Group has implemented additional measures including enhanced training, reporting, and monitoring.”
The settlement follows a March 2016 ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit that reversed a trial judge who found the cumulative effects of the misconduct against women were not enough to go to trial.
The $550,000 settlement will be divided among 16 women who were dismissed from the case in 2012. The company was also ordered to send letters of regret to the women and provide employment references for them. The company will also review its policies to ensure sexual harassment complaints are investigated by neutral employees, designate certain alleged harassers ineligible for rehire and conduct anti-discrimination training.
The Trump administration, reversing an Obama-era policy, embraced the use of for-profit prison providers to house federal detainees. The Washington Post reported in October that GEO Group's lobbying and political donations increased in 2016.
The Campaign Legal Center is suing the Justice Department in Washington court over access to records focused on a $225,000 contribution that GEO Group, a Republican campaign donor, gave to a pro-Trump PAC during the 2016 election.
Separately, GEO Group faces a class action complaint in Colorado that alleges thousands of immigrants detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement were subjected to forced labor.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
3 minute readUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250