Some Federal Workers Are Still Fighting to Get Paid From the Last Shutdown
Four years ago, federal employees sued for the pay they earned for working while the lights were off for the 16-day standoff in 2013. The government with a third party is currently calculating the total amount owed to these workers. "It's inexcusable that we are in this position again. Federal workers are going to work—often in dangerous jobs—and won't know if they will be paid," Washington employment law attorney Heidi Burakiewicz said.
January 22, 2018 at 03:08 PM
5 minute read
Not every federal employee stays home when the government shuts down. Tens of thousands of “essential” workers, including law enforcement officers, park rangers, prison guards and health officials, keep on the clock when the government closes.
Four years ago, 25,000 workers sued for the pay they deserved for working while the lights were off for the 16-day standoff in 2013. The government with a third party is currently calculating the total amount owed to these workers.
Washington-based lawyer Heidi Burakiewicz took on a case in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims after the October 2013 federal government shutdown. A judge ruled in February that the government owed damages to 25,000 employees who continued to work during the shutdown.
Burakiewicz said even though the employees still have not seen their pay, the case has moved quickly. “Litigation is never fast,” she said. Discovery moved along, and “the judge ruled very quickly. We are close to finalizing the process and getting the money to workers soon.”
She added, “It's inexcusable that we are in this position again. Federal workers are going to work—often in dangerous jobs—and won't know if they will be paid.”
The federal government was closed Monday, and regulatory agencies were preparing contingency plans if the funding impasse dragged on. The U.S. Senate reportedly had reached a breakthrough Monday afternoon to resolve, at least temporarily, the dispute.
Burakiewicz of Kalijarvi, Chuzi, Newman & Fitch is lead counsel in at least two cases representing federal workers seeking compensation from the last shutdown. As budget negotiations unfolded in Washington over the weekend, several measures failed, including one that would have continued pay for military and another that would ensure employees would receive retroactive pay.
“The potential is that in this shutdown it could be a very large number, possibly hundreds of thousands of workers, who are affected,” Burakiewicz said. “That could add up. We are working on our current cases, but getting lots of calls and questions about what is going on.”
In Martin et al v. U.S., a collective action on behalf of 25,000 federal employees, a Federal Claims judge found in 2014 that the government violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by failing to pay the essential employees whom it required to work during the October 2013 shutdown on their regularly scheduled pay dates. Burakiewicz said it was the largest Fair Labor Standards Act case in the country.
The court ruled last year the government is liable for liquidated damages to these employees because it did not act in good faith. Those workers, however, are still fighting for those paychecks.
Burakiewicz is also leading a case now in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Marrs v. U.S. The dispute there is over whether the statute of limitation should be extended for several hundred workers who did not get paid during the 2013 shutdown. A judge last year ruled against the workers and Burakiewicz appealed.
Burakiewicz said the federal government did not appear to learn a lesson from the last shutdown. “To me, this is preventable,” she said. “I don't think federal employees should be the negotiating chip. These are people that keep us safe. If they are so important, even in a shutdown, they should not have to wonder if they will be paid.”
Burakiewicz has worked for 18 years representing employees and unions. During her career, she has advocated on behalf of federal employees and secured damages from the government. She won a $20 million settlement in another class action of behalf of 550 female employees of the Federal Bureau of Prisons in Coleman, Florida, who alleged the government failed to take steps to prevent inmates from sexually harassing them.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'New Circumstances': Winston & Strawn Seek Expedited Relief in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute read5th Circuit Rules Open-Source Code Is Not Property in Tornado Cash Appeal
5 minute readDOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250