Another Virtual Currency Player Charged With Fraud by CFTC
The CFTC has alleged that My Big Coin Pay pilfered $6 million from its customers for personal expenses and the purchase of luxury goods.
January 24, 2018 at 02:04 PM
3 minute read
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission building. (Photo: Diego Radzinschi/ALM)
On the heels of two enforcement actions announced late last week, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission has announced fraud charges against yet another company operating in the virtual currency space.
The enforcement action alleges that Las Vegas-based My Big Coin Pay Inc., a virtual currency wallet and platform, misappropriated more than $6 million from its customers for “personal expenses and the purchase of luxury goods,” including a home, jewelry and fine art.
“As a result, MBC customers have lost most, if not all, of their funds due to defendants' fraud and misappropriation,” the commission's Jan. 16 complaint filed in Massachusetts federal court reads. The complaint was shared publicly by the CFTC on Wednesday, after having been under seal.
My Big Coin allegedly misled customers by telling them the company was being actively traded on multiple currency exchanges and by falsifying trading price reports. The company also told customers it was backed by gold, which the CFTC says it was not. “In reality, the supposed trading results were illusory, and any payouts of funds to MBC customers were derived from funds fraudulently obtained from other MBC customers in the manner of a Ponzi scheme,” the lawsuit states.
My Big Coin also lied to customers about a partnership with Mastercard Inc. that would allow customers to use the currency wherever Mastercard is accepted, according to the suit.
A representative from My Big Coin did not immediately respond for comment on the allegations.
The CFTC's complaint and a restraining order were issued by a judge from the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The order froze the assets of the company and its executives, Randall Crater of East Hampton, New York and Mark Gillespie of Hartland, Michigan.
“As this case shows, the CFTC is actively policing the virtual currency markets and will vigorously enforce the anti-fraud provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act,” Director of Enforcement James McDonald said in a press release Wednesday. “In addition to harming customers, fraud in connection with virtual currencies inhibits potentially market-enhancing developments in this area.”
He cautioned potential customers in the red-hot virtual currency market to “engage in appropriate diligence” before buying in.
The year is young, but the order makes the third action the CFTC has taken in 2018 against a company running a virtual currency scheme.
Dina Ellis Rochkind, of counsel at Paul Hastings, who is not involved in this case, said she expects to see more virtual currency enforcement actions coming from both the CFTC and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
“They are very concerned about retail investors who are active in the crypto space,” Rochkind said in an email. “They are also concerned about a potential market crash. The plaintiff's bar has also become more active. That being said, I believe the SEC and CFTC are supporters of crypto, blockchain and ICOs that are operating legally.”
She added, “From a big picture standpoint, Treasury, FinCen and The Hill are becoming more active on this issue because of concerns about money laundering and terrorist financing…I think agencies like Treasury, Homeland Security, etc. are a greater threat to cryptocurrencies than the SEC and CFTC who are looking to protect investors while legitimizing the industry.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'New Circumstances': Winston & Strawn Seek Expedited Relief in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute read5th Circuit Rules Open-Source Code Is Not Property in Tornado Cash Appeal
5 minute readDOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250