Prominent Jenner & Block Pair First to Take on Medicaid Work Mandates
A pair of prominent Jenner & Block partners, Thomas Perrelli and Ian Gershengorn, both former high-ranking federal government lawyers, are representing 15 Kentucky residents in high-stakes litigation challenging the state's newly approved Medicaid work requirements.
January 29, 2018 at 04:41 PM
4 minute read
A pair of prominent Jenner & Block partners have signed on to represent 15 Kentucky residents in a proposed federal class-action suit challenging the state's newly approved Medicaid work requirements.
Thomas Perrelli and Ian Gershengorn, both former high-ranking federal government lawyers based in the firm's Washington, D.C., office, are representing the National Health Law Program in a suit filed last week in federal court in D.C. The other plaintiffs are fellow advocacy groups Kentucky Equal Justice Center and the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Earlier this month, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services approved Kentucky's request for a waiver from federal Medicaid law. The waiver effectively imposes a requirement that able-bodied Medicaid recipients aged 19 to 64 participate in 80 hours per month of employment or “community engagement” activities such as jobs training. In addition, the program imposes a monthly premium based on household income.
The legal challenge to these mandates and premiums is part of Jenner & Block's robust pro bono practice, said Perrelli, founder and chairman of the firm's Government Controversies and Public Policy Litigation Practice. Perrelli previously served three years as U.S. associate attorney general, the third highest-ranking official in the U.S. Department of Justice. Gershengorn worked in the Obama administration for eight years, most recently as acting solicitor general, and now chairs Jenner & Block's Appellate and Supreme Court Practice.
“Both Ian and I have a lot of experience in litigating substantive [Administrative Procedure Act]-type claims in federal court from our experience in the government, so it seemed like a really good fit for us to get together and assist and help on this matter,” Perrelli said in an interview.
Neither HHS officials, nor officials with Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin's office replied to emailed requests for comment on Monday.
The named plaintiffs, who range in age from 20 to 62 and seek class certification, rely on Medicaid but would be unable to comply with the new requirements, thereby jeopardizing their health coverage under the federal safety-net program, the complaint alleges.
“The Secretary's … approval of Kentucky's request … will harm Kentuckians across the state—housekeepers and custodians, ministers and morticians, car repairmen, retired workers, students, church administrators, bank tellers, caregivers, and musicians—who need a range of health services, including check-ups, diabetes treatment, mental health services, blood pressure monitoring and treatment, and vision and dental care,” the complaint says.
The suit is brought largely under the Administrative Procedure Act and argues that the defendants, HHS, CMS and the agencies' top officials, exceeded their authority in approving Kentucky's waiver. It also argues that the work and community engagement requirements “are not an experimental, pilot, or demonstration project, nor are they likely to promote the objectives of the Medicaid Act,” according to the complaint.
The suit also alleges that the waiver approval is a violation of the U.S. Constitution's Take Care Clause, which allows judicial action against presidential action that undermines congressional statutes signed into law.
“The power to 'transform' a congressional program is a legislative power vested in Congress,” according to the complaint. “An effort to 'transform' a statute outside that legislative process is at odds with the President's duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed.”
Other Jenner & Block lawyers involved in the representation include litigation partner Devi Rao, as well as litigation associates Samuel Jacobson, Natacha Lam and Lauren Hartz, all based in the D.C. office. The Kentucky Equal Justice Center and SPLC are represented by attorneys within the organizations.
At least nine other states have proposed similar changes to Medicaid, most of them led by Republican governors. They include Arizona, Arkansas, Indiana, Kansas, Maine, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Utah and Wisconsin, according to Reuters news agency.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Supreme Court Weighs Federal Agencies' Duty Under National Environmental Policy Act
FDA Defends Rejection of Vape-Flavor Applications Before Sympathetic Supreme Court
'Nuclear Option'?: Eli Lilly Taps Big Law Firms in Federal Drug Pricing Dispute
3 minute readDC Judge, Applying 'Loper Bright,' Dismisses Complaint in Medicare Drug-Classification Dispute
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250