DOJ's Political Appointees Missing as Career Lawyers Defend Mueller Probe
A motion to dismiss Paul Manafort's civil case against DOJ bore the names of three career DOJ lawyers, but no political appointees.
February 06, 2018 at 12:49 PM
4 minute read
Justice Department lawyers defended Robert Mueller, the special counsel, in court for the first time last week, but its political leaders were absent from the DOJ's motion to dismiss a lawsuit from Paul Manafort challenging the investigation's authority.
Chad Readler, the acting chief of the Civil Division, was not on the motion, nor was any deputy. Manafort's civil lawsuit against Mueller, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and the department challenges the authority and appointment of the special counsel, who is investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election and potential ties to President Donald Trump's campaign.
Listed on the motion are three lawyers in DOJ's Federal Programs branch: John Tyler, an assistant director, and two trial attorneys, Daniel Schwei and Anjali Motgi. Schwei signed the filing, which defended Mueller's investigation as “entirely lawful.”
The same three lawyers, and no political leaders, were listed on another filing in the case Tuesday, which opposed a motion from the group Freedom Watch to intervene in Manafort's case.
It's routine to put the political leader of the office as the first name on a document, even if that person is acting. It's unclear why Readler, who has led the division since January 2017 absent a Senate-confirmed nominee, was not named on the motion.
A Justice Department spokeswoman declined to comment on why Readler was absent from the filing.
Though prosecutors for the special counsel discussed plans to file the motion at a January hearing in Manafort's criminal case, Peter Carr, a spokesman for the special counsel's office, said in an email that Friday's filing “makes clear” attorneys in the Civil Division, not lawyers in the special counsel's office, filed the document on behalf of Mueller, Rosenstein and the DOJ.
Several former Civil Division lawyers said the absence of political leaders on the document was puzzling, but might suggest DOJ wants to avoid the impression that political leadership is in any way shaping the defense of Mueller's probe.
“It is virtually unheard of for the [Federal Programs] branch to file things without political supervisors,” said one former Civil Division lawyer. “I suspect they wanted to be clear that there was no interference or other involvement by the political people, so as to keep it crystal clear that nobody who was in the Trump political administration was hindering the career people in their effort to stop the lawsuit.”
Attorney General Jeff Sessions is recused from the special counsel's investigation, and Mueller's team interviewed him last month, according to press reports.
It's unclear whether Readler could be a potential witness in the probe or would need to recuse from the Manafort lawsuit for some other reason. Readler was on the initial landing team of officials who took over at DOJ immediately after the inauguration on Jan. 20 last year.
The time period following the inauguration, up until the firing of former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, has become a focus of the special counsel's investigation, according to reports.
Before joining the administration, Readler worked on behalf of Trump's campaign while in private practice at the law firm Jones Day.
Readler, Tyler and Schwei have appeared together on briefs in other cases recently, including filings in the department's defense of Trump's travel ban policies.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Absurd Costs'?: Visa Faces Antitrust Class-Action Surge Following DOJ Complaint
3 minute read'Systemic and Pervasive'?: DiCello Levitt Alleges WWE Child Sexual Abuse Scandal
3 minute readThe 2024 NLJ Awards: Professional Excellence—Appellate Hot List
4th Circuit Revives Workplace Retaliation Lawsuit Against Biden's HHS Secretary
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250