Staff Buyouts Don't Augur Layoffs, Arnold & Porter Says
“This is not a layoff, this is not a prelude to a layoff,” the firm's chairman said, after a leaked memo showed a plan to reduce its legal secretary ranks.
February 06, 2018 at 04:55 PM
3 minute read
Arnold & Porter offices in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM)
Richard Alexander, chairman of the firm known until recently as Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, said Tuesday that a new voluntary buyout program for its legal secretaries had nothing to do with the firm's financial health.
Alexander rejected the idea that the buyout program would have far-reaching effects on the firm or that it could presage a round of layoffs, as suggested by the legal industry blog Above the Law, which first reported the buy-out offers.
“This is not a layoff, this is not a prelude to a layoff,” Alexander said. “This does not at all relate to the financial health of the firm.”
In an internal memo dated Monday and addressed to associates in several offices, the firm said it would offer buyouts to all its U.S.-based legal secretaries later this spring. The memo said volunteers would get “generous” severance packages, but that changes were warranted by changes to “the manner in which we and our competitors are delivering secretarial services.”
While Above the Law speculated that the buyouts could affect “thousands,” Alexander said he anticipated only a handful of the firm's 140 total U.S.-based legal secretaries would choose to participate in the program.
Alexander said his firm offered the voluntary buyouts after analyzing its lawyers' use of secretaries. He said the firm realized that the advent of new technology has meant lawyers are taking more initiative over tasks usually accomplished by secretaries, such as booking travel.
“We, like every other law firm in the United States, have seen some shift in how our lawyers use secretaries—it relates to technology,” Alexander said. “We at our firm, like every other firm, have been moving toward a more sharing, collaborative arrangement.”
Alexander said the firm was on heathy financial footing, and said its decision to shorten its name to “Arnold & Porter” on its website has no connection to the firm's financial stability after its 2017 merger with Kaye Scholer.
“We exceeded our budget for 2017, even though we had one-time merger expenses,” Alexander said. He said he expects 2018 to be even stronger. (The firm's financial results for 2017 have not yet been reported.)
Before the consummation of the $1 billion merger with Kaye Scholer early last year, Arnold & Porter was the much larger firm, with more than $624 million in 2016 revenues and more than 650 lawyers, according to ALM data.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Practice Leaders 'Bullish' That Second Trump Presidency Will Be Good for Business
3 minute readBig Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readFreshfields, Paul Hastings, McDermott, Alston Hire in Core Practices, Amid Flurry of Q4 Lateral Moves
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Apple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
- 2Texas Supreme Court to Review "Implied" Performance Controversy in Oil-Gas Leases
- 3Collections Are Critical for Texas Law Firms Through Year's End
- 4US Judge Rejects Investor Claim That Target Hid Pandemic Inventory Issues
- 5What Will Happen to the Nominees in Florida's Southern and Middle Districts?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250