Why Wilmer's Reginald Brown Registered to Lobby for the First Time in 10 years
It's been a long time since Wilmer's Reg Brown filed any lobbying disclosures. Brown recently filed papers showing he represented the electronics manufacturer Hikvision USA Inc. before the House Small Business Committee.
February 07, 2018 at 01:17 PM
4 minute read
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr's D.C. offices. Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi/ NLJ
The last time Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr partner Reginald Brown registered to lobby was nearly a decade ago, when he and two colleagues, Jamie Gorelick and Rachel Brand, were advocating for Google Inc. on the regulation of online advertising.
In the years since, Brown burnished his reputation as one of Washington's go-to congressional investigation lawyers. He's well-known in Washington legal circles, but not as a lobbyist.
Last week, Brown filed papers showing he had recently represented the electronics manufacturer Hikvision USA Inc. before the House Small Business Committee—a panel that scrutinized the company over its connections to the Chinese government and a cybersecurity vulnerability discovered with its security cameras.
Reginald Brown of Wilmer.Brown declined to comment about his advocacy, and it was unclear whether there's any planned future advocacy beyond the recent representation of Hikvision on Capitol Hill. A representative from the company was not immediately reached for comment Wednesday.
Brown's Feb. 2 registration came days after the House Small Business Committee held a hearing titled “Small Business Information Sharing: Combating Foreign Cyber Threats.” The panel's chairman, U.S. Rep. Steve Chabot, R-Ohio, identified Hikvision in his opening statement as one of the top five manufacturers of security cameras worldwide and as “42 percent owned by the Chinese government.” In 2017, the Department of Homeland Security issued a notice saying some of the company's devices could be exploitable by hackers—a flaw the company worked quickly to fix.
An assistant deputy director in the FBI's Cyber Division and a deputy assistant secretary from the Department of Homeland Security appeared as witnesses. No representative of Hikvision testified.
Brown's filing comes in a climate of heightened scrutiny of federal disclosures for advocacy. In the influence industry, firms have been reassessing their approach to a decades-old law—revived in the prosecution of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort—requiring certain disclosures for lobbying work for foreign clients.
The charges against Manafort include allegations he violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act by failing to disclose lobbying work for the Ukrainian government that predated the 2016 presidential election. Brown last year advised Manafort on congressional inquiries about Russia; Manafort is represented in the criminal case in Washington federal district court by Kevin Downing.
An exemption in the Foreign Agents Registration Act permits advocates for foreign private sector clients to file papers through the Lobbying Disclosure Act as long as an overseas government or political party is not the “principal beneficiary.” Brown's filing was made through the Lobbying Disclosure Act.
Wilmer last submitted a FARA filing to the U.S. Department of Justice in 1996, when the firm reported its relationships with the Swiss Bankers Association, Shoreline Mutual Ltd. and the Banking Federation of the European Union.
Brown, Gorelick and Brand were on Wilmer's Google lobbying team in 2008, lobbying disclosures show. The issues at the time included online advertising and internet openness and innovation. Gorelick, a former President Bill Clinton-era deputy U.S. attorney general, leads the firm's regulatory and government affairs team. Brand is third-in-command at the U.S. Justice Department under U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Brand and Brown both worked as associate counsels in the George W. Bush White House.
Gorelick's lobbying clients over the years have included Sallie Mae and the financial advisory firm Lazard Freres & Co. Brand, in the late 2000s, was registered to lobby for Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America and T-Mobile USA Inc.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
'Nuclear Option'?: Eli Lilly Taps Big Law Firms in Federal Drug Pricing Dispute
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Bolstering Southern California Presence, Sidley Austin Settles Into Revitalized Downtown LA Office
- 2Judge Orders Prosecution to Destroy Copies of Notes Found in Sean Combs' Prison Cell
- 3BIT Mining Bribery Scandal Highlights Trump-Biden Enforcement Gap
- 4AI Startup Founder Defrauded Investors of Millions, US Prosecutors Say
- 5Cyberattacks Slowing Down M&A Deals, Firm Report Finds
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250