Former GE In-House Lawyer Gets 60-Day Suspension in Ethics Case
The D.C. Court of Appeals issued the suspension Thursday for releasing confidential information.
February 08, 2018 at 03:42 PM
3 minute read
The District of Columbia Court of Appeals suspended a former General Electric Co. lawyer for 60 days for disclosing confidential information about her employer after she was fired.
The court suspended Adriana Koeck following a report and recommendation from the D.C. Bar's disciplinary panel, the Board on Professional Responsibility, last August. Koeck disclosed confidential GE documents to media outlets and federal regulators that she believed showed evidence of fraud, according to the board. The court's order said Koeck did not provide any defense of her disclosure.
“Moreover, the board's recommended sanction—a 60-day suspension with a fitness requirement—is reasonable in light of the facts supporting this single violation of Rule 1.6 (a),” the court's order said.
Koeck, now known as Adriana Sanford, currently works as a lecturer at Loyola Marymount University. She declined to comment via email. GE sued Koeck in 2008 over the disclosure, though the lawsuit ended with a settlement in 2009.
Koeck's ethics case was one in a trio brought in 2013 as a result to her actions after leaving GE. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel also brought the ethics charges against high-profile whistleblower attorney Lynne Bernabei of Bernabei & Kabat, and Notre Dame law professor G. Robert Blakey. Bernabei and Blakey were charged with helping Koeck disclose the confidential information.
As part of its August recommendation, the board ordered OCD Disciplinary Counsel Hamilton P. Fox to issue an informal admonition against Bernabei. The board's report found Bernabei violated the bar's rule against assisting or inducing another in misconduct, but not that she interfered with the administration of justice, as Fox alleged.
Fox told The National Law Journal he planned to officially issue Bernabei's admonition Thursday or Friday. Bernabei referred questions to her lawyer, Tom Mason of Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis. Mason declined to comment.
Blakey's case closed in 2015 with an informal admonition.
The Government Accountability Project and National Employment Lawyers Association filed an amicus brief in March last year on behalf of Bernabei and Koeck, arguing Koeck's disclosure of the documents were protected under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act because she was acting as a whistleblower.
The board's adoption of the charges against Bernabei, the brief said, would “chill D.C. attorneys from advising attorney-whistleblowers.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Absurd Costs'?: Visa Faces Antitrust Class-Action Surge Following DOJ Complaint
3 minute read'Systemic and Pervasive'?: DiCello Levitt Alleges WWE Child Sexual Abuse Scandal
3 minute readThe 2024 NLJ Awards: Professional Excellence—Appellate Hot List
4th Circuit Revives Workplace Retaliation Lawsuit Against Biden's HHS Secretary
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Meet the Lawyers on Kamala Harris' Transition Team
- 5Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250