Mulvaney's CFPB Doesn't Want to Keep Arguing Over the Agency's Structure
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is moving to stop at least two companies from continuing to argue that enforcement actions should be dismissed based on an alleged defect in the agency's power structure. Mick Mulvaney, the acting director, said he has "ratified" those two lawsuits.
February 09, 2018 at 03:36 PM
5 minute read
OMB director Mick Mulvaney. Credit: White House
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is moving to stop at least two companies from continuing to argue that enforcement actions should be dismissed based on an alleged defect in the agency's power structure.
Defense lawyers for the companies—the mortgage loan servicer Ocwen Financial Corp. and All American Check Cashing Inc.—had raised constitutional claims that challenged the authority of Richard Cordray, the Obama-appointed director of the agency.
The companies argued that, because the president could only fire Cordray for cause rather than at will, the agency's lawsuits should be dismissed. The CFPB sued Ocwen in the Southern District of Florida, and the complaint against All American Check Cashing was brought in the Southern District of Mississippi. Many other CFPB targets have made similar arguments in federal courts across the country.
This week, CFPB lawyers told federal judges in Florida and in Mississippi there's a problem with these arguments now: The Trump-appointed interim director, Mick Mulvaney, can be fired at will—and that he has “ratified” the decision to bring the cases against Ocwen and All American Check Cashing. If the two courts agree not to address the constitutional arguments, the companies would lose one avenue in their attacks against the CFPB's lawsuits.
The CFPB's arguments signal the agency, at least for now, is moving forward with the cases against Ocwen and All American Check Cashing—two suits that were initiated under Cordray's leadership. The filings from Mulvaney and the CFPB were remarkable in that they reveal some insight into Mulvaney's ongoing review of administrative and enforcement actions. The agency has moved in other matters to drop cases and investigations.
A spokesman for Ocwen—represented by a defense team from Goodwin Procter, BuckleySandler and Greenberg Traurig—did not comment on the recent filing from the CFPB. “We have not briefed Acting Director Mulvaney or his staff on this matter, but would welcome the opportunity,” the company said.
Lawyers for All American Check Cashing, represented by Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, were not immediately reached for comment. The CFPB declined to comment.
The new filings do not necessarily suggest Mulvaney has given his blessing to the Ocwen and All American lawsuits. Rather, the new filings could be an effort to avoid having CFPB lawyers continue to argue over the constitutionality of the agency's structure.
That question was at the heart of a case in a Washington federal appeals court, which in January upheld the CFPB's independent, single-director structure. In the Washington case, the U.S. Justice Department abandoned its earlier defense of the CFPB, and instead argued that the bureau's director wielded too much power. Mulvaney himself is no fan of the power of the CFPB's single-director structure.
So far, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is the only court to rule on the single-director structure.
CFPB lawyers said Ocwen's constitutional challenge “no longer applies” in light of Mulvaney's appointment and ratification of the lawsuit.
“Because Acting Director Mulvaney is removable at will and has ratified the decision to bring this case, [Ocwen] cannot obtain dismissal on the ground that this case was initially filed by an agency led by a director removable only for cause,” the enforcement attorneys wrote. “Acting Director Mulvaney's ratification cured any constitutional problem with this case's initiation.”
Mulvaney, according to the new filings, had “carefully considered” the original decision to bring the lawsuit. “After having been briefed by bureau staff regarding this case, I ratified the bureau's decision to file a lawsuit against [Ocwen],” Mulvaney wrote in a declaration.
Venable LLP partner Gerry Sachs, a former CFPB enforcement attorney, said it's too early to make predictions about where the CFPB's new leadership will take the agency. “While Acting Director Mulvaney has sought a review of regulations, reorganized the CFPB offices, and closed some cases, he is also allowing others to proceed,” he said.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'New Circumstances': Winston & Strawn Seek Expedited Relief in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute read5th Circuit Rules Open-Source Code Is Not Property in Tornado Cash Appeal
5 minute readDOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250