Clarence Thomas Derides 'Myth-Making' of Supreme Court Justices
"We don't have the time, energy, ink or bites to change or to engage in that narrative. We have work to do. We have to write opinions," Thomas said in a wide-ranging interview with Judge Gregory Maggs of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.
February 15, 2018 at 06:19 PM
4 minute read
Justice Clarence Thomas, speaking Thursday at an event hosted by The Law Library of Congress and the Supreme Court Fellows Program. Image via YouTube
The “myth-making” surrounding the U.S. Supreme Court and its justices is one of the worst aspects of the job, said Justice Clarence Thomas during an appearance Thursday at the Library of Congress.
“There's a real, decided difference between what is said about judging and what actually happens,” Thomas said in response to a question about the best and worst parts of his job. “We don't have the time, energy, ink or bites to change or to engage in that narrative. We have work to do. We have to write opinions.”
In reactions to some of those opinions, Thomas said, people will say the justices hate old people, or want to execute people. “I haven't met a judge who wants to execute people. Everyone of us is asking, 'Did I get it right? Did I make a mistake?' And yet people think you're callous.”
Thomas has been accused of callousness and cruelty for dissents in some death cases in which a majority of justices found constitutional errors.
Thomas was in conversation with Judge Gregory Maggs of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The Law Library of Congress and the Supreme Court Fellows Program hosted the event.
The “loss of anonymity” that came with confirmation was another downside to the job, Thomas said. “I don't like the public part,” said Thomas, describing himself as an introvert. But, he added, “That's part of the job.” He called Susan Cain's book “Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can't Stop Talking” one of “the best.”
Thomas described interacting with “my kids”—his law clerks—the best part of being a justice. Thomas stands alone among his colleagues for his efforts to look to beyond Ivy League law schools for some of his clerk hires. Maggs was a 1991-1992 Thomas law clerk.
Thomas spoke briefly about the Senate confirmation process, comparing it to “surgery” and a “spectacle.” The process is not what it ought to be, he said. “This is not the Roman Colosseum. We're not gladiators,” he said.
“We are going to at some point to have the leadership we deserve because we allow the selection process to get out of our control and to have very little to do with selecting the kind of people we need.” He said he does not have “bitter feelings” about his own controversial and narrow confirmation but “I think I am sober in my judgment of it.”
Maggs spent time quizzing the justice about his childhood and education and ended by asking what had changed in his judging over the 27 years he has been on the high court. Thomas compared it to the view of someone on a mountain at 1,000 feet, 5,000 feet and 10,000 feet.
At 10,000 feet, he said, “You see more. I've been doing this so long, I see more; I understand more. Not because you're smarter; it's just that you've been doing it longer. This is what I do. I don't have hobbies, except rooting against Alabama—they stole another national championship! I do law. It consumes you, and virtually everything I do is in preparation of doing this job.”
Read more:
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
Auditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readTexas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250