Rachel Brand Says DOJ Looking to Get Involved in More Class Actions
Rachel Brand, leaving soon for a top legal post at Walmart, said the attorney general plans to review more class action settlements, and may file statements of interest in cases where the department finds a settlement unfair or unreasonable.
February 15, 2018 at 03:32 PM
5 minute read
Rachel Brand, associate attorney general, speaks on a panel at the 2017 ChIPs Women in Tech, Law, & Policy Global Summit in Washington in October 2017. Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi / NLJ
Associate Attorney General Rachel Brand said Thursday the U.S. Justice Department is looking to get involved in more class actions.
Speaking to members of the Federalist Society at a luncheon in downtown Washington, Brand said the attorney general plans to review more class action settlements, and may file statements of interest in cases where the department finds a settlement unfair or unreasonable.
The 2005 Class Action Fairness Act requires that certain officials, in some cases the U.S. attorney general, be notified of and allowed to review class action settlements at least 90 days before they are entered by a court. Brand said that although DOJ receives about 700 of these notices a year, the department has only gotten involved in two cases, both of which were more than a decade ago.
The DOJ under Jeff Sessions has taken positions against class actions in closely watched cases. In the U.S. Supreme Court this term, the U.S. solicitor general's office, switching from the Obama-era position, said companies can lawfully ban class actions in employment agreements.
Brand, who is leaving DOJ next week for a top legal post at Walmart, worked as chief counsel for regulatory litigation at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce until her confirmation last year. The Chamber is a major critic of class actions and the plaintiffs bar.
Brand blamed “an almost comical story of government bureaucracy” for the lack of government participation in the review process. She said CAFA notices get delayed by the DOJ mailroom process, meaning DOJ lawyers often don't review them until after a fairness hearing in court or even after a settlement has been finalized.
Brand said the Justice Department is fixing the process, but she did not elaborate. She said DOJ is “already in a better position to review settlements.”
“Be on the lookout in the coming days for the first example,” Brand said.
|
Brand Questions Lawfulness of Nationwide Injunctions
Brand also criticized federal courts' use of nationwide injunctions, just hours after a second federal appeals court upheld a ruling against President Donald Trump's third travel ban.
Brand said “one of the biggest challenges” facing DOJ is the defense of multiple lawsuits in many courts over a single governmental action. Thursday morning, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled en banc against the Trump administration. The Ninth Circuit's ruling against the travel ban is now on review at the U.S. Supreme Court.
The use of nationwide injunctions by federal courts may not be constitutional, Brand said in her speech.
“There are real questions about whether nationwide injunctions are consistent with Article III of the Constitution, since they grant relief to parties not before the court,” Brand said. “In fact, rather than calling them nationwide injunctions, the term 'non-party injunctions' might be more apt. Whatever you call them, we are challenging their legality in several cases now.”
Sessions has also been critical of nationwide injunctions, which have slowed or stopped several other policies, including the Trump administration's rescission of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy and the ban on transgender people serving in the military.
As a senator, Sessions praised a Texas district judge's injunction against President Barack Obama's Deferred Action for Parents of Americans program in 2015. When Brand worked at the Chamber in 2016, the group celebrated a preliminary injunction that blocked the Obama administration's overtime rule from taking effect.
|
Mum on Move to Walmart
Brand was relatively silent Thursday on last week's news that she will leave DOJ, saying only that it was bittersweet to leave the department, and that she would have been “very happy to stay much longer.”
“Sometimes … something comes up unexpectedly and you just can't pass it up,” Brand said. “That's all there is to it.”
Brand's full prepared remarks are posted below:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhen Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
Justices Seek Solicitor General's Views on Music Industry's Copyright Case Against ISP
SEC Obtained Record $8.2 Billion in Financial Remedies for Fiscal Year 2024, Commission Says
SEC Targets Rising Crypto Financier in $115 Million Securities Fraud
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump and Latin America: Lawyers Brace for US's Hardline Approach to Region
- 2Weil Advances 18 to Partner, Largest Class Since 2021
- 3People and Purpose: AbbVie's GC on Leading With Impact and Inspiring Change
- 4Beef Between Two South Florida Law Firms Deepens With Suit Over Defamation
- 5Judge Skips Over Sanctions in Talc Bankruptcy: 'That’s A No'
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250