Mueller's Team Charges Russian Nationals in US Election Interference
A grand jury in Washington on Friday indicted the Russian organization Internet Research Agency, along with several other associated companies and individuals, on eight charges related to unlawful interference in the 2016 presidential election.
February 16, 2018 at 01:53 PM
4 minute read
U.S. Justice Department headquarters in Washington, D.C. Credit: ALM
A grand jury in Washington on Friday indicted the Russian organization Internet Research Agency, along with several other associated companies and individuals, on eight charges related to unlawful interference in the 2016 presidential election.
The 37-page indictment, filed in Washington federal district court, alleged the company and individuals were engaged in a broad conspiracy with the “strategic goal of sowing discord” during the elections as early as 2014. The defendants focused their efforts on aiding the Trump campaign and disparaging Hillary Clinton, the indictment said.
Individuals working for the organization posed as U.S.-based activists, maintained and operated social media groups and pages “designed to attract U.S. audiences,” purchased advertisements on social media sites, and staged political rallies in the United States to both support and oppose President Donald Trump. The charges include conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud and five counts of identity theft.
➤➤ Stay on top of the latest news in the Mueller investigation with Trump Watch by Cogan Schneier. Sign up here.
“There is no allegation in this indictment that any American was an illegal participant in this activity,” Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who oversees the special counsel's investigation, said during a press conference at the Justice Department.
Rosenstein said there would be no comments from the special counsel's office. The public press announcement was the first as part of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's wide-ranging probe.
Separately, a California man named Richard Pinedo pleaded guilty Feb. 12 to one count of identify fraud, according to recently unsealed documents from the special counsel's office. Pinedo, represented by Los Angeles criminal defense lawyer Jeremy Lessem, is accused of operating an online service designed to circumvent digital payment companies' security features. He also sold bank account numbers over the internet, according to court documents, though it's unclear if his charges are related to the Russians.
The charges were the latest to come out of Mueller's investigation into Russian interference with the 2016 election. Last year, that probe resulted in the indictments of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and another adviser, Rick Gates, on conspiracy and money laundering charges related to foreign lobbying work that predated the campaign. Both have pleaded not guilty, although Gates is reportedly nearing a plea deal with prosecutors.
Another target of Mueller's probe, former national security adviser Michael Flynn, has already pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about his contacts with the Russian ambassador during the transition. Flynn, who is represented by Covington & Burling partner Robert Kelner, is cooperating with the Mueller investigation.
Mueller's team has carried out the investigation against the backdrop of intense political scrutiny.
According to a New York Times report, White House counsel Donald McGahn threatened to quit last summer after President Donald Trump ordered Mueller's firing. McGahn, a former partner at Jones Day, had previously pressed Attorney General Jeff Sessions to stay in charge of the special counsel investigation. Sessions recused himself nonetheless, a move that put the investigation under the guise of Rosenstein.
Rosenstein has been in the president's crosshairs since appointing Mueller to lead the special counsel probe. Associate Attorney General Rachel Brand, who in the event of Rosenstein's firing would have been in line to oversee the investigation, is leaving the Justice Department to be Walmart Inc.'s head of global corporate governance.
The indictment is posted below:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
Auditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readTexas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Congress and Courts are Considering Litigation Financing: Is Disclosure Imminent?
- 2Bar Report — Nov. 25, 2024
- 3People in the News—Nov. 25, 2024—Eckert Seamans, Klehr Harrison
- 4How We Made Practice Group Chair: 'One of the Most Important Skills Is Being a Good Listener,' Say Timothy Kincaid and Brad Vaiana of Winston & Strawn
- 5Avoiding Inadvertent Conflict Issues With Constituents When Representing Organizational Clients
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250