Grand Jury Returns New 32-Count Indictment Against Manafort, Gates
The superseding indictment came from a grand jury in Alexandria, Virginia, separate from the Washington, D.C., grand jury that indicted the two men in Washington, D.C., last year.
February 22, 2018 at 04:44 PM
4 minute read
Paul Manafort Credit: Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
Robert Mueller, the special counsel, brought new charges Thursday against former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and his deputy, Rick Gates.
A grand jury in Alexandria, Virginia, returned a 32-count indictment that includes charges of bank and tax fraud. Manafort and Gates were charged with 12 counts, including money laundering and failure to register as a foreign agent, in October. Both men pleaded not guilty, and U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson has not yet set a trial date for the case in Washington, D.C.
➤➤ Need a guide to the twists and turns in Robert Mueller's investigation? Sign up for Trump Watch by Cogan Schneier.
In a status report filed in the district court in Washington, D.C., lawyers for the special counsel said they were prepared to bring the new charges in D.C., but that one of the defendants would not waive his right to venue. The document did not specify which defendant it was.
“If venue had been waived, the defendants would have faced a single indictment in one district, and not two indictments in adjacent districts,” the document said.
Manafort spokesman Jason Maloni said in an email that his client is innocent and “confident that he will be acquitted of all charges.”
“The new allegations against Mr. Manafort, once again, have nothing to do with Russia and 2016 election interference/collusion,” Maloni said.
Sidley Austin partner Tom Green officially entered an appearance in the D.C. case Thursday evening on behalf of Gates. Green did not respond to a request for comment.
The new charges include 16 counts related to false individual income tax returns, seven counts of failure to file reports of foreign bank and financial accounts, five counts of bank fraud conspiracy and four counts of bank fraud.
The charges allege Manafort and Gates made millions lobbying on behalf of the government of Ukraine, Ukrainian President Victor Yanukovych and his political party, and hid the income from U.S. authorities. They disguised the income as loans and by making payments to offshore accounts, the indictment said. After Yanukovych fled Ukraine for Russia, their income declined, and the indictment claims the two men fraudulently obtained loans by failing to disclose existing debt and falsely inflating their income.
Overall, the indictment said more than $75 million flowed through the offshore accounts. It alleges Manafort “used his hidden overseas wealth to enjoy a lavish lifestyle,” spending millions on “luxury goods” for himself and extended family, and to purchase multimillion-dollar homes. Gates used money to pay for his mortgage, children's tuition and interior decoration of his home.
A spokesman for the special counsel said he did not have any information on when an arraignment will be held.
A hearing on Gates' legal representation was scheduled for Friday morning in D.C., but was cancelled Thursday after Green entered his appearance. Until Thursday, Gates was represented by Shanlon Wu of Wu, Grohovsky & Whipple, Walter Mack of Doar Rieck Kaley & Mack and Annemarie McAvoy of McAvoy Consulting. A judge granted the lawyers motion to withdraw from his case Thursday, though Green has reportedly been working with Gates for weeks.
The new indictment comes just days after Mueller charged Alex van der Zwaan, a former associate at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, with one count of lying to investigators. The son of Russian oligarch German Kahn pleaded guilty Tuesday.
Van der Zwaan admitted to lying about his communications with Gates and an unnamed person in 2016 about a 2012 report he and other Skadden lawyers worked on. The report was on the trial of former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, an adversary of Manafort's client, Yanukovych. Manafort reportedly helped arrange for Skadden to conduct the report.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All3rd Circuit Nominee Mangi Sees 'No Pathway to Confirmation,' Derides 'Organized Smear Campaign'
4 minute readPresidential Immunity Doesn't Block Trump's NY Criminal Prosecution, Judge Rules
DC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readJustices to Decide if Fuel Industry Can Sue Over California’s EV Rules
Trending Stories
- 1Mental Health Issues Don’t Get a Holiday
- 2'It's Got to Be a Wake-Up Call:' Atlanta Attorney Hopes $16M Verdict Spurs Training Changes at Hotels
- 3FTC Bans 'Junk Fees' in Live-Event Tickets and Short-Term Lodging
- 4California Legal Awards Moving to Mid-Summer Date in 2025, Adds New Categories
- 5Law Student Sues NY Attorney Grievance Officials, Seeking Materials Over Sexual Assault Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250