Editor's Note: The Road Ahead as SCOTUS Takes Up Travel Ban 3.0
In this editor's note, Editor in Chief Lisa Helem unpacks what's in store for readers in the March issue of National Law Journal. First and foremost, what's ahead for President Trump's travel ban at the U.S. Supreme Court?
March 01, 2018 at 10:22 AM
3 minute read
This month's cover illustration, by Jim Tsinganos, visually represents the uncertainty surrounding the third iteration of President Donald Trump's travel ban as the U.S. Supreme Court prepares to hear oral arguments in April. As Marcia Coyle and Cogan Schneier report in our cover story, advocates for immigrants' rights and the government will square off on issues including whether the ban violates immigration law and the establishment clause of the U.S. Constitution. Read about what's ahead and which justices may tip the balance.
Next, Sacramento-based reporter Cheryl Miller writes about how lawyers that serve clients in legal, marijuana-related businesses are dealing with the issue of finding banks willing to maintain accounts for them. Save congressional action, is there a solution to this challenge? One attorney doesn't think so.
And in “1 on 1: Conversations with Newsmakers,” San Diego County-based intellectual property reporter Scott Graham interviews University of San Diego law professor Orly Lobel about the increasing intensity of intellectual property litigation and her latest book “You Don't Own Me.” Lobel's book recounts, in colorful detail, the legal battle between Mattel and MGA over rival doll lines.
In Legal Times, Ryan Lovelace, our Washington-based business of law reporter, reports on the recent move of a trailblazing retired federal appeals judge to Jones Day. Ann Claire Williams made history as the first African-American woman appointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Read more about her private practice plans in that story.
Also, in that section, another Ryan, Washington-based regulatory reporter C. Ryan Barber, catches us up on the latest with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. In January, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld the lawfulness of the single-director power structure of the agency, which, as Barber reports, “will carry wide implications as companies continue to challenge the agency.” Is a showdown at the U.S. Supreme Court next? Stay tuned.
Finally, in our opinion column, Courtney G. Saleski and Mark A. Kasten of DLA Piper write about Attorney General Jeff Sessions' recent reversal of prior Department of Justice guidance related to the prosecution of marijuana-related crimes. Read about why they say criticism from Congress “may, paradoxically, serve as the catalyst for more responsible reform by lawmakers.”
We invite you to share your thoughts with us. Email me at the address below or tweet me at @lhelemNLJ. As always, thank you for reading and stay in touch.
Lisa Helem [email protected]
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNLJ December/January Editor's Note: What's Driving White Collar Defense and Antitrust Anxieties
2 minute readApril Editor's Note: Gearing up for Regulatory Action & Why Judges Leave the Bench
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250