No, Justice Ginsburg and Former US Solicitors Are Not Advising This Crypto Company
"I am not into cryptocurrency—I generally try to avoid things that start with crypto," Paul Clement says. The Texas State Securities Board, in a cease-and-desist order, said a crypto company was promoting—wrongly—that RBG and a group of former U.S. solicitors were advising the outfit.
March 01, 2018 at 01:20 PM
5 minute read
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg waves at NYU Law School on Monday, Feb. 5th, 2018. Photo credit: David Handschuh
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and former U.S. Solicitors General Theodore Olson, Seth Waxman and Paul Clement have an obvious professional connection but never one as legal overseer for an online company promoting cryptocurrency investments in Texas.
The Texas State Securities Board this week sent a cease-and-desist letter to a company called LeadInvest, which allegedly was using a photograph of the justice and the lawyers, including former deputy Solicitor General Maureen Mahoney of Latham & Watkins, as its “CodeOfEthics Association.” LeadInvest billed itself as a technology company developing trading software for cryptocurrency markets, according to the Texas state board.
Among six counts—with multiple subparts—of misleading and deceptive statements listed in the board's letter was this eye-popping one:
“Respondent LEADINVEST is claiming that the 'CodeOfEthics [sic] Association' is responsible for contract law, due diligence and corporate law, and it is providing a photograph that purports to portray the members of 'CodeOfEthics [sic] Association.' Respondent LEADINVEST is not telling investors that the photograph of the members of the 'CodeOfEthics [sic] Association' actually depicts former Deputy Solicitor General Maureen Mahoney, former Solicitor General Theodore Olson, Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, former Solicitor General Paul Clement, and former Solicitor General Seth Waxman.”
The state board accused the company of failing to tell investors that the photograph was the same one that ran in a 2005 article about a George Washington School of Law event titled “Symposium Honors Rehnquist's Legacy/Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Delivers Keynote Address.” The law school owns the image and did not give permission to LeadInvest to use it, according to the board. O'Melveny & Myers partner Walter Dellinger also appeared in the photograph.
The Texas securities board said George Washington law school had not given LeadInvest permission to use the photo.
Olson, who leads the Supreme Court and appellate practice at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and was U.S. solicitor general during the George W. Bush administration, told The National Law Journal that the company's name-drop of him was obviously “all bogus.” He also disclaimed any in-depth understanding of cryptocurrency: “Especially at my age, I'm giving a wide berth to anything involving crypts.”
Kirkland & Ellis partner Clement had a similar reaction.
Paul Clement“What a hoot!” said Clement, solicitor general in the second term of the George W. Bush administration. “I am not into cryptocurrency—I generally try to avoid things that start with crypto. That said, I have been known to attend a gathering of former SGs from time to time.”
Mahoney, a retired partner in Latham's Supreme Court and appellate practice, served as deputy solicitor general from 1991 to 1993. Waxman, co-chair of the appellate and Supreme Court litigation practice at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, was solicitor general in the Clinton administration from 1997 through 2001. Neither Mahoney nor Waxman was available to comment.
Other photographs on the LeadInvest website, according to the Texas securities board, featured images of lawyers at firms in California and North Carolina that had no affiliation with the crypto company.
The Texas board's cease-and-desist letter was addressed to a web hosting company with a P.O. Box in Panama. A contact there was not immediately found. The LeadInvest website redirects to another cryptocurrency site that disclaims there is no single owner or entity. LeadInvest has 31 days to request a hearing at the Texas securities board. Any failure to request a hearing results in the agency's order becoming final.
Joe Rotunda, director of enforcement for the Texas securities board, told the San Antonio Express-News that the agency is receiving a number of consumer complaints about fraudulent cryptocurrency products.
“I think a lot of it comes out to being a product of the internet, where anyone can be anonymous. Anyone can kind of put up anything on the internet,” Rotunda told the Express-News. “And that includes pictures of a Supreme Court justice, and former solicitors general and attorneys who are completely unrelated to the offer and sale of cryptocurrency investments. It's brazen, it's threatening, it's hurt a lot of people.”
The Texas State Securities Board order is posted below:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Extremely Troubling:' Trump Defense Team Attacks Prosecutor's Novel Arguments Against Dismissing Case
Investors Sue in New York Over $440M International Crypto Ponzi Scheme
4 minute readCoinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Luigi Mangione's Attorney Gives a Master Class in How Not to Handle a High-Profile Case in the Media
- 2Trump, ABC News Settlement in Defamation Lawsuit Includes $1M in Attorney Fees For President-Elect
- 3Trump, ABC News Settle Defamation Lawsuit Before Depositions
- 4Call for Nominations: The Recorder and Law.com's California Legal Awards 2025
- 5The Week in Data Dec. 13: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250