Revenue Up, Partner Profits Flat at Perkins Coie
Despite the winding down of a big litigation matter and a lack of contingency wins, Perkins Coie posted its highest revenue ever in 2017, a modest tick up over 2016.
March 05, 2018 at 04:04 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Perkins Coie posted record gross revenue and net income in 2017, while profits per equity partner remained flat at $1.173 million and revenue per lawyer dipped by less than 2 percent, according to preliminary ALM reporting.
The firm's gross revenue came in just shy of $786 million in 2017, less than 1 percent higher than the prior year's results. Perkins Coie's net income in 2017 grew 1.4 percent over the prior year to $149.36 million. Those increases, while modest, bring both of the figures to their highest-ever level, said Perkins Coie managing partner John Devaney.
The firm's profits per equity partner fell less than half-a-percent, from $1.178 million in 2016 to the 2017 figure of $1.173 million. Revenue per lawyer dropped 1.8 percent in 2017 to $833,000. Perkins Coie's head count grew in 2017 to 944 lawyers, up 2.5 percent from 921 lawyers in 2016, while the firm added four partners overall—three of them boosting the equity partnership headcount.
The managing partner also noted that one of the firm's large, recent litigation matters—a trade secrets dispute in which the firm represented Zillow Inc. against rival real estate website Move Inc.—settled midway through 2016 on the eve of a trial. With the end of that case, which was “keeping several dozen lawyers busy, full-time,” Devaney said Perkins Coie's litigation group spent much of the first quarter in 2017 refilling a pipeline of work.
As the year went on, the firm picked up steam and the early signs for 2018 are good, said Devaney, who explained that, among other areas, he expects Perkins Coie's political law team to be highly active as the midterm election season ramps up in the United States.
“We finished on a very strong note in the fourth quarter,” he said.
Devaney highlighted several litigation matters that kept Perkins Coie's lawyers busy in 2017, including three cases that went to the U.S. Supreme Court. Two of those were voter redistricting cases alleging racial gerrymandering—one arising out of the districts drawn for Virginia's state General Assembly and another arising out of the U.S. congressional districts in North Carolina—while a third dealt with sovereign immunity questions involving Native American tribes.
The firm also picked up a significant role in an internal investigation of sexual harassment and misconduct allegations at Uber Inc. In that matter, Perkins Coie's investigation ran parallel to one led by U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder Jr., now a Covington & Burling partner, who looked at Uber's corporate culture as a whole.
On the transactional front, Devaney said, “We represented Amazon in more than 25 investments in startup companies.” He pointed, specifically, to advising the online retail giant in connection with an investment in GRAIL Inc., a life sciences company focused on early detection of cancer.
Beyond its litigation, investigations and transactional work, Devaney said the firm has also taken steps to strengthen ties with top clients, including several in the technology sector, by having some of the firm's nonlawyer staff consult with the clients' law departments on a range of “operational” issues. Those efforts, he said, have involved people such as Perkins Coie's diversity chief, a legal pricing expert the firm has on staff, and the firm's information technology chief, who can advise law departments on billing systems and other areas.
“Our nonlawyer staff regularly visit with the law departments of our top clients … to assist them with their operational efficiency,” Devaney said. “It's something where we're seeing a lot of demand.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
3 minute readUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250