Special Master Delays High-Stakes Report on $75M Class Action Fee Request
A special master looking into potential overbilling in a $75 million attorney fee request has delayed the findings of a report he said could have “serious and far-reaching adverse ramifications” for plaintiffs firms in the case and “for the practice of the plaintiffs' class action bar.”
March 06, 2018 at 07:34 PM
4 minute read
A special master looking into potential overbilling in a $75 million attorney fee request has delayed the findings of a report he said could have “serious and far-reaching adverse ramifications” for plaintiffs firms in the case and “for the practice of the plaintiffs' class action bar.”
Retired U.S. District Chief Judge Gerald Rosen of the Eastern District of Michigan, now of the JAMS mediation service, was appointed special master a year ago in a securities class action settlement with State Street Corp. after a federal judge raised concerns about the billing activities of three plaintiffs firms. In a Feb. 28 letter to the judge, Rosen asked that he extend a March 15 deadline for his report to be completed. That would give plaintiffs lawyers more time, he wrote, to respond to an 85-page expert report that New York University School of Law professor Stephen Gillers prepared for him as part of the investigation.
“Counsel pointed out that the stakes for their clients are extraordinarily high in this matter,” Rosen wrote. They told him “that if I were to adopt in my report the opinions of professor Gillers, there could potentially be serious and far-reaching adverse ramifications [for] at least some of the firms, and even beyond this investigation for the practice of the plaintiffs' class action bar and even for courts in class actions.”
On March 1, U.S. District Judge Mark Wolf in Boston granted the request. The report is now due on April 23.
➤➤ Get class action news and commentary straight to your inbox with Critical Mass by Amanda Bronstad. Learn more and sign up here.
Attorneys from the three plaintiffs firms under investigation—New York's Labaton Sucharow, San Francisco's Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein and Thornton Law Firm in Boston—did not respond to requests for comment. Joan Lukey, a lawyer at Boston's Choate Hall & Stewart, who represents Labaton, also did not respond.
Last year, following a series of articles in The Boston Globe raising questions about Thornton's political donations and allegations of overbilling in the State Street case, the three firms admitted they double counted hours in the case. Wolf previously had approved a $300 million settlement of cases alleging State Street had overcharged pension fund clients in foreign currency trades. He also approved the fees but, in a letter to the court, Labaton Sucharow's David Goldsmith admitted “inadvertent errors” in the billing of staff attorneys who worked temporarily for the firm—a mistake that led to an additional $4.1 million in the fee request.
The three firms agreed to pay up to $2 million to cover the costs of the special master's probe. They have since raised unsuccessful objections about a consultant Rosen hired, John Toothman, calling him a “partisan advocate.”
On Sept. 29, Rosen asked for more time to complete his report, citing “recent events related to the discovery phrase of the investigation.” On Oct. 6, he asked for $1 million more, which Wolf granted. On Dec. 12, Rosen asked for a second extension due to “much more work than anticipated.”
According to Rosen's letter asking for a third and final extension, he retained Gillers to respond to a report by a plaintiffs attorneys' expert. Rosen said he provided Gillers' report on Feb. 23, but plaintiffs lawyers said they needed more time to respond. Plaintiffs lawyers also wanted to depose Gillers, the letter said.
“They also indicated that they may wish to retain an additional expert to address professor Gillers' report, which they contend constitute a 'novel' approach to Massachusetts attorney referrals. (We, of course, do not agree with that characterization of professor Gillers' report.),” Rosen wrote.
Plaintiffs lawyers planned to name that expert by March 10.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Administration Faces Legal Challenge Over EO Impacting Federal Workers
3 minute readPrivate Equity Giant KKR Refiles SDNY Countersuit in DOJ Premerger Filing Row
3 minute readQuinn Emanuel Files Countersuit Against DOJ in Row Over Premerger Reporting
3 minute read'Thoughtful Jurist': Maryland US District Senior Judge Messitte Dies After Short Illness
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Whether to Choose State or Federal Court in a Case Involving a Franchise?
- 2Am Law 200 Firms Announce Wave of D.C. Hires in White-Collar, Antitrust, Litigation Practices
- 3K&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
- 4'Better of the Split': District Judge Weighs Circuit Divide in Considering Who Pays Decades-Old Medical Bill
- 5Which Georgia Courts Are Closed Today?—Here's a List
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250