Report: Trump's Judicial Nominees Have Most 'No' Votes So Far
An analysis from the Pew Research Center shows an increase in senators' opposition to judicial nominations.
March 07, 2018 at 04:27 PM
3 minute read
More senators have voted against confirming President Donald Trump's nominees for federal courts, on average, than those of any other recent president, according to an analysis from the Pew Research Center published Wednesday.
The Senate has confirmed 29 of Trump's appointees to the bench, including U.S. Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and 14 judges for the powerful appellate courts. The Pew analysis, based on data from the Federal Judicial Center and the Senate, said there have been a total of 654 “no” votes cast on the floor of the Senate against those 29 nominees. That means an average of nearly 23 votes against each confirmed judge.
That's “by far the highest average for any president's judges since the Senate expanded to its current 100 members in 1959,” the report said. All of the votes against Trump's judges came from Democrats or independents who caucus with Democrats, except for one vote from Sen. John Kennedy, R-Louisiana, against the nomination of Gregory Katsas to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Trump has made reshaping the federal bench a cornerstone of his presidential agenda. The president is still early on in this endeavor: President Barack Obama appointed 330 judges to the bench in his tenure, and President George W. Bush appointed 328. However, last year, the Senate confirmed a dozen of Trump's nominees for appellate courts, setting a record for the most ever in the first year of a presidency.
The average “no” votes against nominees have increased over time: Obama's judges faced an average of six votes against them, George W. Bush's had an average of two, and President Bill Clinton's had an average of a little more than one.
Go back in time a bit further, and the opposition shrinks further. Of President John F. Kennedy's nominees, only one received any “no” votes: Thurgood Marshall, in his 1962 confirmation to the Second Circuit.
The analysis also noted that the success rate for judicial nominees has wavered over the past few decades. While 99 percent of Kennedy's picks were confirmed, only 78 percent of George H.W. Bush's were. Obama had an 83 percent success rate.
“It's too early to measure Trump's success rate in any meaningful way,” the analysis said, though it pointed out that at least three of Trump's nominees have withdrawn from consideration in the wake of controversy. Those include Middle District of Alabama nominee Brett Talley, District of Columbia nominee Matthew Petersen and Eastern District of Texas nominee Jeff Mateer.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Files Appeal to DC Circuit Aiming to Intervene in Google Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readDC Circuit Revives Firefighters' Religious Freedom Litigation in Facial Hair Policy Row
3 minute readDC Judge Chutkan Allows Jenner's $8M Unpaid Legal Fees Lawsuit to Proceed Against Sierra Leone
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250