First of 2 Trials for Paul Manafort Set for July
A federal judge in the Eastern District of Virginia has set a start date of July 10 for the first of Manafort's two trials.
March 08, 2018 at 03:13 PM
4 minute read
Paul Manafort/Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
A federal judge on Thursday set a July 10 trial date for former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort.
Manafort pleaded not guilty Thursday to 18 charges brought by special counsel Robert Mueller, including tax and bank fraud, in the federal court in the Eastern District of Virginia. Manafort's lawyer, Kevin Downing, said at the arraignment Thursday that he would prefer Manafort's trial in Virginia be later this fall, after the trial scheduled for him in Washington, D.C., on Sept. 17. Downing said if he were wearing “rosy glasses,” the trial would be in November.
“You need to go back to the optometrist because that ain't gonna happen,” said U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis, an appointee of President Ronald Reagan.
Manafort and his former deputy, Rick Gates, were indicted by a grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia last month. Ellis dismissed charges against Gates last week, at the request of federal prosecutors, after Gates pleaded guilty to separate but related charges in the District of Columbia.
Manafort waived his right to have the charges in Virginia brought along with the charges in Washington. He and Gates were originally indicted in D.C. in October, and a superseding indictment was filed against Manafort there last month. The charges in D.C. include conspiracy to launder money, failure to register as a foreign agent and making false statements. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson is overseeing that case.
The trial in Virginia is expected to last eight to 10 days. Lawyers for the special counsel said they intend to call roughly 20 to 25 witnesses. However, all of the discovery has already been produced, special counsel lawyer Greg Andres said.
Manafort's motion to dismiss the case, which Downing said he intends to file, is due April 30. In D.C., the deadline for the motion to dismiss is next week. Downing said he plans to argue in both motions that the special counsel exceeded his mandate in bringing the charges. Downing also made that argument in a separate civil lawsuit filed in D.C., also before Jackson.
Other pretrial motions, such as motions in limine, are due June 22. A hearing on those is set for June 29.
Ellis also ordered Manafort to be kept on home confinement with GPS monitoring, because the judge said Manafort is a flight risk due to his wealth and contacts overseas. That means Manafort will wear two GPS monitor bracelets, as Jackson, the judge in D.C., also required one.
Ellis also asked how the trial in Virginia will “complicate” the trial in D.C. Andrew Weissman, a lawyer for the special counsel, explained that while Manafort faces tax fraud charges in Virginia, those charges are the subject of the conspiracy charge in Washington.
“Why should we try that charge twice?” the judge asked.
Weismann said special counsel lawyers had gone over the charges with Downing and Manafort, but stressed that Manafort chose to waive his right to have the newer charges brought in D.C.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Absurd Costs'?: Visa Faces Antitrust Class-Action Surge Following DOJ Complaint
3 minute read'Systemic and Pervasive'?: DiCello Levitt Alleges WWE Child Sexual Abuse Scandal
3 minute readThe 2024 NLJ Awards: Professional Excellence—Appellate Hot List
4th Circuit Revives Workplace Retaliation Lawsuit Against Biden's HHS Secretary
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250