Parents of Murdered DNC Staffer Seth Rich Sue Fox News Over Pulled WikiLeaks Story
The parents allege the company's publication of the initial story—which was later retracted but not before fueling an online conspiracy theory—made them “collateral damage in a political war to which they are innocent bystanders.”
March 14, 2018 at 11:44 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
The parents of a murdered Democratic National Committee staffer whose death fueled a right-wing conspiracy over DNC emails published by WikiLeaks during last year's presidential election filed suit against Fox News late Tuesday, alleging the company's publication of the initial story made them “collateral damage in a political war to which they are innocent bystanders.”
The suit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York by Joel and Mary Rich, whose son, Seth, was murdered in July 2016, accuses Fox News reporter Malia Zimmerman and frequent guest and political operative Ed Butowsky of “intentionally exploit[ing] this tragedy—including through lies, misrepresentations and half-truths—with disregard for the obvious harm that their actions would cause Joel and Mary.”
“No parent should ever have to live through what we have been forced to endure. The pain and anguish that comes from seeing your murdered son's life and legacy treated as a mere political football is beyond comprehension,” the Riches said in a joint statement.
The Riches' suit is the latest legal action taken in the Southern District over the May 16, 2017, publication and subsequent removal of the article written by Zimmerman that suggested Rich's murder was connected to his alleged contact with WikiLeaks prior to his death. The Riches' suit goes on to point to programming on Fox that they claim propagated baseless assertions that their son provided the DNC emails to WikiLeaks, even after Fox retracted Zimmerman's article a week after its publication.
Massey & Gail name attorney Leonard Gail, whose firm represents the parents, said the suit sought to hold the defendants “accountable for their reprehensible actions.”
“Whether motivated by party politics, ratings, corporate profit or personal gain, we hope to help prevent this kind of malicious and reckless behavior in the future so that others can be spared the hell the Riches have had to endure,” Gail said in a statement.
In October, Rod Wheeler, a former Fox News commentator who is quoted in the Zimmerman article, filed his own defamation lawsuit against the news organization, Butowsky and Zimmerman, claiming among other things that the two individuals used fake quotes attributed to him. That case remains ongoing.
In a statement, a Fox News spokeswoman said the company declined to comment on pending litigation.
Reached by phone Wednesday, Butowsky, a Dallas-based financial adviser, said that, even as he felt compelled to defend himself, “who wants to defend themselves against grieving parents? Of course I don't want to.”
Since he didn't write the article, suing him over it amounted to a “frivolous, baseless lawsuit.” He claimed that his interactions with the parents prior to its publication was simply in an attempt to help.
“Not only does my heart go out to them, but my wallet went out to them,” he said, appearing to refer at least to his offer to pay Wheeler to investigate Rich's death.
Butowsky said that Joel Rich had been “very happy with the article” when it was initially published. All he's ever asked from the couple, he said, was for them to “tell people what they know.” Butowsky went on to state that he has communications between himself and the couple that he says substantiate the core of the theory promoted by the Fox News article—that Rich provided WikiLeaks with emails.
“If I chose to do discovery, they're opening themselves up to a lot,” he said, “because they told me they didn't want people to know what their son did.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhen Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
Justices Seek Solicitor General's Views on Music Industry's Copyright Case Against ISP
SEC Obtained Record $8.2 Billion in Financial Remedies for Fiscal Year 2024, Commission Says
SEC Targets Rising Crypto Financier in $115 Million Securities Fraud
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 2Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
- 3Warner Bros. Accused of Misleading Investors on NBA Talks
- 4FTC Settles With Security Firm Over AI Claims Under Agency's Compliance Program
- 5'Water Cooler Discussions': US Judge Questions DOJ Request in Google Search Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250