Ted Olson Quickly Rejected Offer To Join Trump Legal Team
A source said Olson declined the president's offer the morning after receiving it.
March 20, 2018 at 01:16 PM
2 minute read
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher litigation co-chair Theodore Boutrous confirmed in a tweet Tuesday that his partner Theodore Olson will not join the legal team representing President Donald Trump.
The Washington Post reported Tuesday that Trump's legal team had reached out to Olson, a former U.S. solicitor general and top national appellate lawyer, “to join forces” as the president confronts special counsel Robert Mueller's probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election.
A source familiar with the law firm's decision-making, who could only speak anonymously, told ALM that Olson declined the invitation Tuesday morning, a day after he was contacted about joining the team.
Olson has top conservative credentials. He was U.S. solicitor general during the George W. Bush administration, after representing Bush at the U.S. Supreme Court in Bush v. Gore.
But he famously teamed up with David Boies, his opponent in Bush v. Gore, to fight California's ban on same-sex marriage.
Joining Trump's legal team could have exposed Gibson Dunn to conflicts. For instance, Boutrous is representing Fusion GPS, the firm behind the so-called Trump dossier.
Boutrous and other attorneys also led the defense in the U.S. Supreme Court of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, commonly known as DACA, created by the Obama administration in 2012. Last month, the Trump administration lost its bid in the high court to quickly terminate the immigration program.
Boutrous has been vocal against Trump not only in court, but also on Twitter. In a tweet during the 2016 election campaign, he offered to defend pro bono “anyone Trump sues for exercising their free speech rights.”
This week's overture to Olson by the Trump team is the second time Olson has been approached, after reportedly being contacted last year.
When asked for comment about the latest developments, a firm spokeswoman referred to Boutrous' tweet.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Practice Leaders 'Bullish' That Second Trump Presidency Will Be Good for Business
3 minute readFrom Guaranteed Comp to Ethics Screens, How Big Law Navigates the Revolving Door
7 minute read'Everybody Is Holding Their Breath': Big Law Lobbying Businesses See Mixed Earnings in Q3
3 minute readKirkland, Skadden Top Global M&A League Tables for First Nine Months
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-58
- 2Sweet James Clinches $17.4M Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California's Kings County
- 3In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 4Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 5The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250